A comparative analysis of multi-level computer-assisted decision making systems for traumatic injuries

Abstract

BackgroundThis paper focuses on the creation of a predictive computer-assisted decision making system for traumatic injury using machine learning algorithms. Trauma experts must make several difficult decisions based on a large number of patient attributes, usually in a short period of time. The aim is to compare the existing machine learning methods available for medical informatics, and develop reliable, rule-based computer-assisted decision-making systems that provide recommendations for the course of treatment for new patients, based on previously seen cases in trauma databases. Datasets of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients are used to train and test the decision making algorithm. The work is also applicable to patients with traumatic pelvic injuries.MethodsDecision-making rules are created by processing patterns discovered in the datasets, using machine learning techniques. More specifically, CART and C4.5 are used, as they provide grammatical expressions of knowledge extracted by applying logical operations to the available features. The resulting rule sets are tested against other machine learning methods, including AdaBoost and SVM. The rule creation algorithm is applied to multiple datasets, both with and without prior filtering to discover significant variables. This filtering is performed via logistic regression prior to the rule discovery process.ResultsFor survival prediction using all variables, CART outperformed the other machine learning methods. When using only significant variables, neural networks performed best. A reliable rule-base was generated using combined C4.5/CART. The average predictive rule performance was 82% when using all variables, and approximately 84% when using significant variables only. The average performance of the combined C4.5 and CART system using significant variables was 89.7% in predicting the exact outcome (home or rehabilitation), and 93.1% in predicting the ICU length of stay for airlifted TBI patients.ConclusionThis study creates an efficient computer-aided rule-based system that can be employed in decision making in TBI cases. The rule-bases apply methods that combine CART and C4.5 with logistic regression to improve rule performance and quality. For final outcome prediction for TBI cases, the resulting rule-bases outperform systems that utilize all available variables.

An automated method for analysis of microcirculation videos for accurate assessment of tissue perfusion

“…Future studies will test the MCA algorithm on larger datasets—including human microcirculation videos—and improved accordingly. To overcome the variance among different video recordings, machine learning techniques, in particular neural networks and support vector machines that show superior performance in detection of elongated vessel-like objects in both biomedical image processing applications [32,33] as well as other image processing applications [34], will be applied and algorithm parameters adjusted accordingly. The use of machine learning techniques provide for a means to compensate for variations due to differences in factors such as lighting, pressure, video quality and specific machine/camera used for imaging.…”

Biomedical Informatics for Computer‐Aided Decision Support Systems: A Survey

“…Computer-aided decision support systems play a vital role in reducing diagnosis time, improving resource allocation efficiency, and decreasing patient mortality. Ji et al describe a study that provides a comparative analysis of computer-assisted decision-making systems for traumatic injuries [14]. Systems such as one developed by Frixea et al show how case-based reasoning techniques for the estimation of patient outcomes and resource utilizations can improve patient care dramatically in ICUs [15].…”

Data Mining in Neurology

“…Several studies analyzed genomic data, clinical parameters at admission, and laboratory tests while comparing different Data Mining techniques. Ji and colleagues proposed a Data Mining procedure to provide the clinician with useful guidelines supporting the decision making processes in the management of traumatic brain injury patients (Ji et al, 2009). They proposed a multi-level system able to give suggestions congruent to the condition in which data were acquired: on-site (data acquired at the side of accident), off-site (information acquired at admission to the hospital, such as co-morbidities and complications), and helicopter (data acquired during transportation to the hospital).…”