2015
DOI: 10.5120/ijca2015905922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Analysis of MRI Brain Tumor Segmentation Technique

Abstract: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a powerful visualization tool that permits to acquire images of internal anatomy of human body in a secure and non-invasive manner. The important task in the diagnosis of brain tumor is to determine the exact location, orientation and area of the abnormal tissues. This paper presents a performance analysis of image segmentation techniques, viz., Genetic algorithm, KMeans Clustering and Fuzzy C-Means clustering for detection of brain tumor from brain MRI images. The performan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 22 features with AMSOM-FKM used by the proposed algorithm were the overcoming factor for all other techniques. The average accuracy of KMFCM [20] was 98%, SOM-FKM [19] was 94%, and the proposed was high at 99.8%. The MRI images of different data compared with different algorithms implemented by researchers formed in one tumor region are clearly illustrated in Table 4.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The 22 features with AMSOM-FKM used by the proposed algorithm were the overcoming factor for all other techniques. The average accuracy of KMFCM [20] was 98%, SOM-FKM [19] was 94%, and the proposed was high at 99.8%. The MRI images of different data compared with different algorithms implemented by researchers formed in one tumor region are clearly illustrated in Table 4.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The 22 features with AMSOM-FKM used by the proposed algorithm were the overcoming factor for all other techniques. The average accuracy of KMFCM [ 20 ] was 98%, SOM-FKM [ 19 ] was 94%, and the proposed was high at 99.8%.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations