2017
DOI: 10.1504/jgba.2017.088908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative analysis of international and domestic acquisitions: what drives acquirer competitiveness?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…M&As are perceived as one of the most important phenomena in modern economies (Kwoka, 2002) with their occurrence increasing in US, Europe and internationally (Steynberg and Veldsman, 2011;Faruk Genc and Zakaria, 2017). Their increased frequency could be the outcome of the perception held by several researchers in that it is a strategy for organisational growth even during a recession (Steynberg and Veldsman, 2011;Saksonova and Kantane, 2016;Campanella et al, 2016).…”
Section: Historical and Functional Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M&As are perceived as one of the most important phenomena in modern economies (Kwoka, 2002) with their occurrence increasing in US, Europe and internationally (Steynberg and Veldsman, 2011;Faruk Genc and Zakaria, 2017). Their increased frequency could be the outcome of the perception held by several researchers in that it is a strategy for organisational growth even during a recession (Steynberg and Veldsman, 2011;Saksonova and Kantane, 2016;Campanella et al, 2016).…”
Section: Historical and Functional Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also variation in the outcomes of them depending on the type of acquisitions. For instance, Genc & Zakaria (2017) made a distinction between domestic and international acquisitions and found that domestic acquisitions perform better than international ones.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%