Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2022
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11123478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Analysis of Functional Status and Mobility in Stroke Patients with and without Aphasia

Abstract: All researchers agree that aphasia is a serious consequence of a stroke, but they also report contradictory data regarding the functional outcome. The aim of this study was, therefore, to assess the functional outcomes of stroke patients with and without aphasia, who were undertaking a regular rehabilitation programme. Materials and Methods: The study group consisted of 116 post-stroke patients, including 54 patients without aphasia (G1) and 62 patients with aphasia (G2). The following tests were used before (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…54 However, conflicting evidence surrounds whether adults with post-stroke aphasia experience worse quality of life compared to non-aphasic stroke counterparts. [54][55][56] Evidence suggests follow-up time and adaptation strategies are important factors in determining functional outcome as those with aphasia for more than 6 months tend to report improved quality of life than recently aphasic individuals. 55 Interestingly, the temporal relationship between specific deficits and quality of life does not seem to apply to memory impairment post-stroke, suggesting the critical role of memory in determining quality of life prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…54 However, conflicting evidence surrounds whether adults with post-stroke aphasia experience worse quality of life compared to non-aphasic stroke counterparts. [54][55][56] Evidence suggests follow-up time and adaptation strategies are important factors in determining functional outcome as those with aphasia for more than 6 months tend to report improved quality of life than recently aphasic individuals. 55 Interestingly, the temporal relationship between specific deficits and quality of life does not seem to apply to memory impairment post-stroke, suggesting the critical role of memory in determining quality of life prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…improvement of the patient's functional status is an integral part of the recovery process and regaining independence of patients after a stroke. Unfortunately, many factors hinder this process 8 , 10 , 12 , 13 . One of them may be cognitive disorders 25 28 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies conducted so far mainly concern patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild dementia. In many research projects (including stroke patients), the presence of CI or dementia is the criteria for excluding patients from participation in research 3,8,12,13,14 . Therefore, there are few reports on poststroke patients with moderate-to-severe dementia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%