2016
DOI: 10.1537/ase.151104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative analysis of fetal to subadult femoral midshaft bone distribution of prehistoric Jomon hunter-gatherers and modern Japanese

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22 On the other hand, the average femur length in the Japanese population has been reported to be 395.7 mm. 23 Theoretically, it is thus easier for the 235 to 240 mm nails to exceed the femoral isthmus of the Japanese population. This might decrease the wiper motion, which we defined as repetitive motion of the distal nail inside the femoral canal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 On the other hand, the average femur length in the Japanese population has been reported to be 395.7 mm. 23 Theoretically, it is thus easier for the 235 to 240 mm nails to exceed the femoral isthmus of the Japanese population. This might decrease the wiper motion, which we defined as repetitive motion of the distal nail inside the femoral canal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…impact bone morphology (Aiello & Dean, 1990;Mizushima et al, 2016;Trinkaus, 1975). However, this variation can also be attributed to several factors, ranging from nutrition to climatic adaptation and locomotor efficiency (Allen, 1877, Bogin et al, 2002Higgins & Ruff, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that bone shape is influenced by the tensions experienced during development. As a result, habitual positions and locomotion patterns during growth can impact bone morphology (Aiello & Dean, 1990; Mizushima et al, 2016; Trinkaus, 1975). However, this variation can also be attributed to several factors, ranging from nutrition to climatic adaptation and locomotor efficiency (Allen, 1877, Bogin et al, 2002; Higgins & Ruff, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, given the central role of the growth and development period for establishing adult skeletal characteristics, investigating the habitual activity patterns of immature individuals can be particularly informative (Pearson & Lieberman, 2004). Several recent studies (e.g., Cowgill, 2010Cowgill, , 2014Harrington & Osipov, 2018;Mizushima et al, 2016;Osipov et al, 2016;Osipov et al, 2020) have examined diaphyseal robusticity in immature remains from archeological and paleoanthropological contexts to understand patterns of activity in these populations before adulthood. The study of activity patterns during growth can tell us much about group mobility, when children started engaging in adult habitual activities, as well as underlying factors affecting variation in bone adaptive responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%