2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative analysis of a novel flow field pattern with different channel size configurations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For models I and III, the maximum downstream pressure was developed at the end of one complete cycle due to fully developed flow [ 45 , 46 ]. In microchannels [ 47 , 48 ], the flow restriction parameter R depended on the channel length, which caused maximum pressure to be generated at the inlet region for the case of the non-Newtonian viscosity formulation with sinusoidal and physiological flows in serpentine models S1 and S2. For the non-Newtonian formulation with physiological flow of serpentine model 2, minimal variations in the magnitude of the flow parameters were found due to insignificant variation of the pressure gradient at different flow fluxes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For models I and III, the maximum downstream pressure was developed at the end of one complete cycle due to fully developed flow [ 45 , 46 ]. In microchannels [ 47 , 48 ], the flow restriction parameter R depended on the channel length, which caused maximum pressure to be generated at the inlet region for the case of the non-Newtonian viscosity formulation with sinusoidal and physiological flows in serpentine models S1 and S2. For the non-Newtonian formulation with physiological flow of serpentine model 2, minimal variations in the magnitude of the flow parameters were found due to insignificant variation of the pressure gradient at different flow fluxes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though the relation between the power generation characteristics and O2 profile or flow filed distribution was discussed, that between the power generation characteristics and the temperature distribution was not studied. Regarding the general PEMFC operated below 353 K, the several flow fields of separator such as a modified parallel flow field [16], a blocked flow field [17], a modified serpentine wave flow filed [18], a straight channel with baffled obstacles [19] and an ultrathin steel separator whose thickness was 0.1 mm [20] were investigated. Since the weight ratio of separator to that of total cell is approximately 80 % [21], it is important to optimize the design of separator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%