2015
DOI: 10.11591/telkomnika.v13i2.6976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Compact Multiple Band-Notched Planer Antenna with Enhanced Bandwidth Using Parasitic Strip Lumped Capacitors and DGS-Technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various types of microstrip line crossovers have been reported to replace air-bridge crossovers, which mainly includes the following types: double rings [3], ring-patch [4], two-section branch-line couplers [5], microstrip line to CPW transitions [6], conductor-backed CPW [7], microstip to slot line transitions [8]. The double rings crossover in [3] achieves a bandwidth of 20% and an isolation of 20 dB. The ring-patch crossover in [4] is an improvement of [3], which achieves a bandwidth of 44% and an isolation of 18 dB.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various types of microstrip line crossovers have been reported to replace air-bridge crossovers, which mainly includes the following types: double rings [3], ring-patch [4], two-section branch-line couplers [5], microstrip line to CPW transitions [6], conductor-backed CPW [7], microstip to slot line transitions [8]. The double rings crossover in [3] achieves a bandwidth of 20% and an isolation of 20 dB. The ring-patch crossover in [4] is an improvement of [3], which achieves a bandwidth of 44% and an isolation of 18 dB.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The double rings crossover in [3] achieves a bandwidth of 20% and an isolation of 20 dB. The ring-patch crossover in [4] is an improvement of [3], which achieves a bandwidth of 44% and an isolation of 18 dB. Structure in [5] is a dual-band crossover, whereas the bandwidth is narrow.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [4,5], the antenna produced four bands at 4.64, 5.04, 5.62 and 6.22 GHz. In addition, the antenna in [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] can generate four bands at 2.8, 4, 5.4 and 6.2 GHz to cover WLAN/WiMAX. However, none of these antennas can satisfy the C and X bands for mobile and satellite applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [13], a square-slot antenna with symmetrical L-strips is presented for WLAN and WiMAX applications, but the three resonant frequencies cannot be tuned independently. Many promising UWB antennas have been discussed in the literature [14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%