2013
DOI: 10.1109/lawp.2013.2264837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Compact Frequency Selective Surface With Stable Response for WLAN Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be due to strong surface impedance dependence at oblique incidence on the plane and polarization. However, it can also be found that the shifts of the frequency response with the change O p e r a t i n g b a n d Dual [6] 2.208 0 × 2.208 0 3.4, 0.5 mm Single Dual [7] 0.104 0 × 0.104 0 4.4, 1.6 mm Single Dual [8] 0.081 0 × 0.081 0 2.65, 1.5 mm Single Dual [9] 0.062 0 × 0.062 0 3.66, 0.254 mm Single Single [10] 0.172 0 × 0.172 0 4.3, 1.6 mm Single Single [11] 0.095 0 × 0.095 0 4.3, 1.6 mm Single Dual [12] 0.061 0 × 0.061 0 2.65, 1 mm Dual Single [13] 0.088 0 × 0.088 0 4.3, 1.6 mm Dual Single [14] 0 of the incident angle are opposite for transverse magnetic (TM) and transverse electric (TE) incidences. It is further observed from Figure 2 that the variation in the amplitude levels (i.e., the resonance bandwidth) in TM mode increases with increase in the angle of incidence, whereas in TE mode, it is falling rapidly as the angle of incidence increases.…”
Section: Analysis Of Fss Resonance Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This may be due to strong surface impedance dependence at oblique incidence on the plane and polarization. However, it can also be found that the shifts of the frequency response with the change O p e r a t i n g b a n d Dual [6] 2.208 0 × 2.208 0 3.4, 0.5 mm Single Dual [7] 0.104 0 × 0.104 0 4.4, 1.6 mm Single Dual [8] 0.081 0 × 0.081 0 2.65, 1.5 mm Single Dual [9] 0.062 0 × 0.062 0 3.66, 0.254 mm Single Single [10] 0.172 0 × 0.172 0 4.3, 1.6 mm Single Single [11] 0.095 0 × 0.095 0 4.3, 1.6 mm Single Dual [12] 0.061 0 × 0.061 0 2.65, 1 mm Dual Single [13] 0.088 0 × 0.088 0 4.3, 1.6 mm Dual Single [14] 0 of the incident angle are opposite for transverse magnetic (TM) and transverse electric (TE) incidences. It is further observed from Figure 2 that the variation in the amplitude levels (i.e., the resonance bandwidth) in TM mode increases with increase in the angle of incidence, whereas in TE mode, it is falling rapidly as the angle of incidence increases.…”
Section: Analysis Of Fss Resonance Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These parameters normally control the overall frequency response of the structure, such as its resonance frequency, bandwidth, and dependence on the polarization and incidence angle. In recent years, several structures have been proposed to miniaturize the FSS [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Metallic patches and wire mesh separated by thin airgaps constituting an FSS [6] have been proposed at X-band.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is a large volume of published studies describing techniques to optimize FSS geometry to ensure that the structure is capable to provide multi resonance behavior with a higher packing density without compromising the angular stability [4]. There are various compact structures that were proposed in literature either as a bandstop or bandpass filter [5]- [7]. In this paper, a nested double square loop FSS is proposed with dual-band stop behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [10], the authors showed a project of cascading FSS to block the second and third ISM bands and UNII band. In [11], the authors proposed a compact FSS to reject 5 GHz band with angular stability for TE and TM modes of polarization. None of those projects blocked all ISM bands and UNII bands with angular stability and independence of polarization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%