1996
DOI: 10.3109/16066359609005564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Community Study of Natural Change Across the Addictions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional qualitative perspectives have proven to be beneficial in the field of substance abuse. In a qualitative study of addictive behaviors, McCartney (1996) found that when participants were asked about how they changed to be free from addictive behaviors, they often answered why they made the decision to make the change. This is an important distinction because while the how is important in getting a person to treatment, without 1224 understanding the why, we will not fully understand their motivations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Additional qualitative perspectives have proven to be beneficial in the field of substance abuse. In a qualitative study of addictive behaviors, McCartney (1996) found that when participants were asked about how they changed to be free from addictive behaviors, they often answered why they made the decision to make the change. This is an important distinction because while the how is important in getting a person to treatment, without 1224 understanding the why, we will not fully understand their motivations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For each drug type, the most commonly endorsed reason for change involved some form of cognitive evaluation of whether the drug use was still worthwhile. A study by McCartney (1996) explored the natural history of various addictions in a community sample, including participants who had changed their smoking or drinking. For former smokers, the most commonly endorsed reasons for change were health, financial concerns, humiliation for lacking selfcontrol, and family pressure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Este instrumento consta de 4 factores bien diferenciados (pensamiento positivo, pensamiento negativo, distracción y evitación) y ha mostrado una buena consistencia interna y validez de constructo,. Además, se incluyó un instrumento de 23 ítems, Maintenance factors (Factores de Mantenimiento), que se corresponden con los factores que más influyen en el mantenimiento del cambio en la recuperación natural según estudios previos de recuperación natural como cambios en factores familiares, de salud, laborales o legales (Blomqvist, 1999;McCartney, 1996;Sobell et al, 1992;Sobell et al, 1993;Toneatto, Sobell, Sobell y Rubel, 1999).…”
Section: Variables E Instrumentosunclassified