2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A community evaluation of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy for children with prenatal substance exposure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There remains a dearth of research on outcomes of PCIT among children with prenatal opioid exposure. While Egan and colleagues [ 58 ] recently explored the immediate outcomes of a community-based implementation of PCIT for children with prenatal substance exposure, there is a growing need for thorough and long-term investigations of parent- and child-level PCIT outcomes. Recently, Gurwitch and Warner-Metzger [ 59 ] proposed an adaptation to PCIT that aims to standardize the approach to addressing childhood trauma within the PCIT model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There remains a dearth of research on outcomes of PCIT among children with prenatal opioid exposure. While Egan and colleagues [ 58 ] recently explored the immediate outcomes of a community-based implementation of PCIT for children with prenatal substance exposure, there is a growing need for thorough and long-term investigations of parent- and child-level PCIT outcomes. Recently, Gurwitch and Warner-Metzger [ 59 ] proposed an adaptation to PCIT that aims to standardize the approach to addressing childhood trauma within the PCIT model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because therapy graduation and attrition were not always clearly documented in the notes, this study considered the family to have completed PCIT if they attended three or more PDI sessions. The PCIT protocol (Eyberg & Funderburk, 2011) specifies that the third PDI session can be the last session of treatment because subsequent sessions introduce additional skills that are not needed for some families who have reached graduation criteria (Egan et al, 2020). Although Egan et al (2020) also note that "an arbitrary cutoff is not ideal where progress through the content of the CDI and PDI phases is based on skills mastery rather than number of completed sessions," (p. 4) other studies of child therapy have used the "adequate dose" criterion as an estimate (Silverman et al, 2008).…”
Section: Methods Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PCIT protocol (Eyberg & Funderburk, 2011) specifies that the third PDI session can be the last session of treatment because subsequent sessions introduce additional skills that are not needed for some families who have reached graduation criteria (Egan et al, 2020). Although Egan et al (2020) also note that "an arbitrary cutoff is not ideal where progress through the content of the CDI and PDI phases is based on skills mastery rather than number of completed sessions," (p. 4) other studies of child therapy have used the "adequate dose" criterion as an estimate (Silverman et al, 2008). Though it may not reflect the true completion rate for the sample, as some families may have continued past PDI Session 3 to reach PDI mastery and ended treatment before reaching other graduation criteria, data from Sessions after PDI-3 was not evaluated.…”
Section: Methods Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCIT has been tested with samples that included large numbers of African American families the findings included a reduction of child physical abuse (Ware et al, 2003), long-term physical abuse (Chaffin et al, 2004), and recidivism in the CWS (Chaffin et al, 2012). Additionally, adaptations of PCIT have been found to be beneficial for substance using families (Egan et al, 2020) and families affected by trauma (Messer et al, 2022).…”
Section: Therapeutic Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%