2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A community analysis of sal (Shorea robusta) forests in the western Terai of Nepal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
65
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
65
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Without the basic understanding about the structure of a community, it is impossible to know its functioning. Thus a lot of phytosociological studies have been conducted throughout the world to understand the structure of different forest communities (Campbell et al, 1986;Timilsina et al, 2007;Top et al, 2009;Sambare et al, 2011;Erenso et al, 2014). In Indian scenario, several phytosociological studies have also been performed in different tropical forests: Western India (Sharma and Upadhyaya, 2002;Panchal and Pandey, 2004;Krishna et al, 2014), Peninsular India (Parthasarathy et al, 1992;Visalakshi, 1995;Parthasarathy, 1999;Mani and Parthasarathy, 2005;Gunaga et al, 2013), North East India (Bhuyan et al, 2003;Kumar et al, 2006;Kibria and Saha, 2011;Sarkar and Devi, 2014) and Northern India (Singh and Singh, 1991;Sagar et al, 2003;Pandey and Shukla, 2003;Chauhan et al, 2008;Tripathi and Singh, 2009;Behera et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without the basic understanding about the structure of a community, it is impossible to know its functioning. Thus a lot of phytosociological studies have been conducted throughout the world to understand the structure of different forest communities (Campbell et al, 1986;Timilsina et al, 2007;Top et al, 2009;Sambare et al, 2011;Erenso et al, 2014). In Indian scenario, several phytosociological studies have also been performed in different tropical forests: Western India (Sharma and Upadhyaya, 2002;Panchal and Pandey, 2004;Krishna et al, 2014), Peninsular India (Parthasarathy et al, 1992;Visalakshi, 1995;Parthasarathy, 1999;Mani and Parthasarathy, 2005;Gunaga et al, 2013), North East India (Bhuyan et al, 2003;Kumar et al, 2006;Kibria and Saha, 2011;Sarkar and Devi, 2014) and Northern India (Singh and Singh, 1991;Sagar et al, 2003;Pandey and Shukla, 2003;Chauhan et al, 2008;Tripathi and Singh, 2009;Behera et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variations in these attributes are observed due to climate, topography, soil and anthropogenic factors. These factors along with forest succession causes local and landscape level variations in forest attributes and produce spatial heterogeneity (Timilsina et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diversity (H) was determined by using Shannon-Weiner information index [51] as H= -∑ni/n log2 ni/n; where ni was the SIV value of a species and n was the sum total SIV values of all species in that forest type. Simpson's diversity index [52] was calculated as Ds = 1-Cd, Where Cd = Simpson's concentration of dominance = (∑ni/n) 2 . Indices used to calculate 'r' species evenness included Peilou's Index [53] as E 1 = H/ln (s) and Sheldon's Index [54] E 2 = eH/s, where H is Shannon-Wiener's Index and 's' is the number of species.…”
Section: Species Richness and Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%