2006
DOI: 10.1080/09511920500340858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A communications framework for extended enterprise performance measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While we acknowledge that, we also recognize the formidable challenges in developing EE performance measures that span the range of collaborating supply chain partners. Folan et al (2006) present a view in which communications fills the void in inter-organizational performance measurement. With recognition of the EE core concept that suppliers and customers can no longer be treated as "them" (they are all part of the larger "us"), they make the case for an EE based on principles of the balanced score card, but their performance measurement solution fails to address the question of which metrics should be used to measure system-wide performance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While we acknowledge that, we also recognize the formidable challenges in developing EE performance measures that span the range of collaborating supply chain partners. Folan et al (2006) present a view in which communications fills the void in inter-organizational performance measurement. With recognition of the EE core concept that suppliers and customers can no longer be treated as "them" (they are all part of the larger "us"), they make the case for an EE based on principles of the balanced score card, but their performance measurement solution fails to address the question of which metrics should be used to measure system-wide performance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the most cited PMSs that deal with the interoperability of business processes, in a higher or lower depth, are the following: Supply Chain Balanced Scorecard Framework (Brewer and Speh, 2000); Gunasekaran Framework (Gunasekaran et al, 2001); Integrated Measurement System (Bullinger et al, 2002); Process-Based Framework (Chan and Qi, 2003); Supply Chain Performance Metrics Framework (Gunasekaran et al, 2004); Extended Enterprise Performance Measurement System (Folan and Browne, 2005); Extended Enterprise Performance Measurement Model (Bititci et al, 2005); Communications Framework for Extended Enterprise Performance Measurement (Folan et al, 2006); Model and a PMS for Collaborative Supply Chain (Angerhofer and Angelides, 2006) and Framework to Analyse Collaborative Performance (Gruat La Forme et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multi-agent technology reduces the supply chain performance measurement delays (Teimoury, Fathian, and Chambar 2013). Bititci et al (2002), Folan, Higgins, and Browne (2006) and Saiz et al (2010) have developed certain information technology (IT) based architectures for the SC performance measurement. Chiu, Sheng, and Chen (2008) have provided the MAS in the e-Learning PMS.…”
Section: The Link Analysis Methods For the Sc Performance Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%