2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A common weight MCDA–DEA approach to construct composite indicators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
72
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The other steps are as follows: selection of indicators and data, imputation of missing data, and normalization of the selected indicators. Furthermore, Hatefi and Torabi [44] proposed a common weight multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA)-DEA approach for constructing CIs, whereas Zhou et al [23] developed a multiplicative optimisation approach for constructing CIs, using the weighted product (WP) method.…”
Section: A Composite Sustainability Index Of a Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other steps are as follows: selection of indicators and data, imputation of missing data, and normalization of the selected indicators. Furthermore, Hatefi and Torabi [44] proposed a common weight multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA)-DEA approach for constructing CIs, whereas Zhou et al [23] developed a multiplicative optimisation approach for constructing CIs, using the weighted product (WP) method.…”
Section: A Composite Sustainability Index Of a Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single-criteria Traditional ABC [14][15][16][17][18] Multicriteria Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) [19,20] Cluster analysis [21,22] Decision tree [23,24] Distance modeling [25] Genetic algorithm [6] Graphical matrix [26][27][28] Neural network [2,29,30] Optimization models [1,3,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37] optimization models will highlight the shortcomings of using one model over other models. This will help a decision-maker in selecting the right model for the data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hatefi and Torabi (2010) used a single stage optimization to find a common set of weights for all countries. They considered the deviations of the scores from 100% as one-sided residuals and computed the weights which minimised the largest of these deviations (i.e.…”
Section: Hdi and Data Envelopment Analysis (Dea)mentioning
confidence: 99%