1997
DOI: 10.1161/01.atv.17.10.1969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Common Mutation in the Lipoprotein Lipase Gene Promoter, −93T/G, Is Associated With Lower Plasma Triglyceride Levels and Increased Promoter Activity In Vitro

Abstract: Single-strand conformational polymorphism analysis of the lipoprotein lipase promoter identified a T-->G transition at position -93. The frequency in healthy white men was 3.4% (n = 1575). There was an 83% allelic association between -93T-->G and Asp9-->Asn (D9N); all N9 mutations occurred on a -93G allele, but not all -93G mutations occurred on an N9 allele. It was thus possible to assess the effect on plasma triglyceride (Tg) levels of the rare -93G mutation in the presence of the wild-type D9. Carriers of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
59
3
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
10
59
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In both cell types, the mutant G allele was associated with a modest 20% lower transcription activity than the wild type T allele. This modest effect (20% difference in promoter activity) is predicted from a common variant and is similar to the effect size of 18-24% difference in promote activity reported earlier for a common LPL promoter variant (−93 T/G) [28]. These data strongly suggest that human LPL promoter controls LPL expression in conjunction with regulatory elements present in intron 8 and confirm the original observation made by Enerbäck et al [25].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In both cell types, the mutant G allele was associated with a modest 20% lower transcription activity than the wild type T allele. This modest effect (20% difference in promoter activity) is predicted from a common variant and is similar to the effect size of 18-24% difference in promote activity reported earlier for a common LPL promoter variant (−93 T/G) [28]. These data strongly suggest that human LPL promoter controls LPL expression in conjunction with regulatory elements present in intron 8 and confirm the original observation made by Enerbäck et al [25].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…24 Using a human adrenal cell line, NCIH295, which has been shown to secrete LPL, 25 a similar (18%) increase in luciferase activity was seen with the G allele. 24 Although this variant was not associated with altered lipid profile in this study population, the association of this promoter variant with different measures LPL gene variants, obesity and type 2 diabetes in Asian Indians V Radha et al of obesity suggests it could be an important contributor to obesity and type 2 diabetes in this ethnic group. The À53 G-C promoter polymorphism of the LPL gene was found to be a rare variant in Dutch, Black and Chinese populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…8,28 -35 In favor of the Asp9Asn substitution is the change in charge of LPL induced by the substitution of aspartate with asparagine: located in the N-terminal end of LPL, this amino acid substitution may influence catalytic activity. 3 Furthermore, in contrast to whites, single heterozygotes for the T(Ϫ93)3 G mutation were found in 50% to 60% of 161 black South Africans 34 and of 81 AfroCaribbeans, 35 and in these populations the Ϫ93G allele was found to be associated with lower plasma triglyceride levels compared with carriers of the Ϫ93T allele; this suggests that the Asp9Asn substitution may be the determining factor for the elevation of plasma triglycerides in whites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%