2016
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.12666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A common framework for identifying linkage rules across different types of interactions

Abstract: Summary1. Species interactions, ranging from antagonisms to mutualisms, form the architecture of biodiversity and determine ecosystem functioning. Understanding the rules responsible for who interacts with whom, as well as the functional consequences of these interspecific interactions, is central to predict community dynamics and stability. 2. Species traits sensu lato may affect different ecological processes by determining species interactions through a two-step process. First, ecological and life-history t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
171
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(132 reference statements)
2
171
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we used a recently developed framework by Bartomeus et al [23] that enables prediction of the probability of interactions between plants and animals (or other interaction partners) based upon their abundance and functional traits (implemented in R package traitmatch). A major strength of this framework is its ability to partition these probabilities into 'neutral' and 'niche' components, which can be compared using log-likelihoods.…”
Section: (F ) Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, we used a recently developed framework by Bartomeus et al [23] that enables prediction of the probability of interactions between plants and animals (or other interaction partners) based upon their abundance and functional traits (implemented in R package traitmatch). A major strength of this framework is its ability to partition these probabilities into 'neutral' and 'niche' components, which can be compared using log-likelihoods.…”
Section: (F ) Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For deadwood, the amounts of three different chemical compounds (acid-soluble lignin, Klason lignin and organic extractives) were determined as important resource traits, which are expected to shape interactions with the decomposer community. We were particularly interested in whether network characteristics were determined by niche-based matching of resource traits and beetle traits or by the relative abundance of co-occurring beetle species [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other environments, the structuring force seems to vary with the specific type of interaction examined (Petchey et al 2008;Dunne et al 2013). Indeed, multiple recent studies stress the need for identifying common rules dictating who interacts with whom within large communities (Gravel et al 2013;Morales-Castilla et al 2015;Bartomeus et al 2016). Interestingly, when food webs from different environments are collated in joint analyses of, e.g., latitudinal trends, partly different patterns appear in different environments, again suggesting slightly different drivers in different systems (Schleuning et al 2012;Morris et al 2014;Cirtwill et al 2015).…”
Section: Emerging Differences Similarities and Links Between The Tementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A trait-matching function describes the probability of observing this interaction, given the traits of the two species [66]:…”
Section: Quantifying the Functional Structure And Diversity Of Food Websmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The niche model was fitted directly with the assumption that body size is the main niche axis and that the predator-prey body size relationship represents the optimal niche of a species [85]. This method was successfully extended to other types of interactions, such as plant-herbivores where traits such as leaf dry matter content and incisive strength are good predictors of interactions [66]. Crea et al [86] considered multinomial regression to model interaction probability based on plant and pollinator traits and abundance.…”
Section: Relating Trait Structure To Network Topologymentioning
confidence: 99%