Abstract:In this paper, we prove common fixed point theorems in fuzzy metric spaces for weakly compatible mappings along with property (E. A.) satisfying implicit relation. Property (E. A.) buys containment of ranges without any continuity requirement besides minimizing the commutativity conditions of the maps to commutativity at their point of coincidence. Moreover, property (E. A.) allows replacing the completeness requirement of the space with a more natural condition of closeness of the range.
“…Unfortunately, Theorem 4.1 and hence in Corollary 4.1 are not true in its present form. On critical examination of the results given in paper [1], we notice one crucial error.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Proof of Theorem 4.1 and hence in Corollary 4.1 given in paper [1] are wrong as the existence of the limit lim n→∞ Ay n = z is not proved. It is proved only that, if this limit exists, then it must be equal to z.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to avoid repetition, we assume the terminology and the notations utilized in [1] rather than presenting the same again. Utilizing the concept of property (E.A), M. Verma et al [1] proved Theorem 4.1 and hence in Corollary 4.1 in fuzzy metric spaces.…”
The aim of this note is to point out errors in Theorem 4.1 and hence in Corollary 4.1 of the paper [1] proved in fuzzy metric spaces. We also rectify errors in both results.
“…Unfortunately, Theorem 4.1 and hence in Corollary 4.1 are not true in its present form. On critical examination of the results given in paper [1], we notice one crucial error.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Proof of Theorem 4.1 and hence in Corollary 4.1 given in paper [1] are wrong as the existence of the limit lim n→∞ Ay n = z is not proved. It is proved only that, if this limit exists, then it must be equal to z.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to avoid repetition, we assume the terminology and the notations utilized in [1] rather than presenting the same again. Utilizing the concept of property (E.A), M. Verma et al [1] proved Theorem 4.1 and hence in Corollary 4.1 in fuzzy metric spaces.…”
The aim of this note is to point out errors in Theorem 4.1 and hence in Corollary 4.1 of the paper [1] proved in fuzzy metric spaces. We also rectify errors in both results.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.