2006
DOI: 10.1080/06939280500453064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A commentary on “Why DCF capital budgeting is bad for business and why business schools should stop teaching it”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two commentaries on this very article, however, recommend that we not throw the baby out with the bathwater. Wouters [2006] and Weil and Oyelere [2006] see value in the framework offered by DCF modeling. Both argue that DCF models should be used in conjunction with other strategic investment decision models.…”
Section: Capital Budgeting Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two commentaries on this very article, however, recommend that we not throw the baby out with the bathwater. Wouters [2006] and Weil and Oyelere [2006] see value in the framework offered by DCF modeling. Both argue that DCF models should be used in conjunction with other strategic investment decision models.…”
Section: Capital Budgeting Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adler (2006a) provides an argument as to why discounted cash flow (DCF) capital budgeting is not suitable for business and why it should no longer be taught. Numerous authors comment on Adler's position, including Wouters (2006), Weil and Oyelere (2006), Simga-Mugan (2006), Jones (2006), Paisey (2006), and Fogarty (2006a). Adler (2006b) responds to these criticisms of his position regarding DCF-based capital budgeting.…”
Section: Managerial and Cost Accountingmentioning
confidence: 99%