2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2006.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comment on the topological phase for anti-particles in a Lorentz-violating environment

Abstract: Recently, a scheme to analyse topological phases in Quantum Mechanics by means of the nonrelativistic limit of fermions non-minimally coupled to a Lorentz-breaking background has been proposed. In this letter, we show that the fixed background, responsible for the Lorentz-symmetry violation, may induce opposite Aharonov-Casher phases for a particle and its corresponding antiparticle. We then argue that such a difference may be used to investigate the asymmetry for particle/anti-particle as well as to propose b… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that the Lorentz-violating background, when coupled to the gauge field as in Lagrangian (1), does not alter the electrostatic sector. Analysis of Maxwell equations (4,5,6) in the static regime reveals that this scenario remains true even in the presence of a non-null current. Hence, the scalar potential and electric field achieved here are the same for a point-like charge in uniform motion (stationary solution), once the current J does not contribute to A 0 .…”
Section: A Solution For a Purely Timelike Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This means that the Lorentz-violating background, when coupled to the gauge field as in Lagrangian (1), does not alter the electrostatic sector. Analysis of Maxwell equations (4,5,6) in the static regime reveals that this scenario remains true even in the presence of a non-null current. Hence, the scalar potential and electric field achieved here are the same for a point-like charge in uniform motion (stationary solution), once the current J does not contribute to A 0 .…”
Section: A Solution For a Purely Timelike Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In this scenario, a minuscule Lorentz violation at a lower energy scale (scrutinized into the framework of the SME) is to be read as a remanent effect of spontaneous Lorentz violation at Planck scale. Nowadays, Lorentz violation has been investigated in many different systems and purposes [3], involving also fermions [4], CPT and Lorentz-violating probing tests [5], topological phases [6], radiative corrections [7] and the gauge sector [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[110], one can find the current limits on the coefficients of the Lorentz symmetry violation. In recent years, Lorentz symmetry breaking effects have been investigated in the hydrogen atom [111], on the Rashba coupling [112,113], in a quantum ring [114], in Weyl semi-metals [115], in tensor backgrounds [116,117], in the quantum Hall effect [118], and geometric quantum phases [119][120][121].…”
Section: Geometrical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This new nonminimal coupling term may be CPT-odd or CPT-even. There are various applications for both terms [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. In this paper, the CPT-odd term is chosen to calculate the Lorentz violation correction to the electron-electron scattering, known as Möller scattering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%