2015
DOI: 10.7185/geochemlet.1602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cometary origin for martian atmospheric methane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
65
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(83 reference statements)
1
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, a meteor shower flux onto Mars of the order of 10 8 kg required to generate the Mumma et al (2009) methane plume would have to be an extraordinary event. Even if the Mumma et al (2009) is in error by an order of magnitude as proposed by Zahnle (2011), other measurements in the 10s of ppbv of methane exist (see Table 1 of Fries et al, 2016). Therefore, a meteor shower delivering three or four orders of mass more than the typical flux is needed to generate methane in the tens of ppbv as Crismani et al (2017) state.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, a meteor shower flux onto Mars of the order of 10 8 kg required to generate the Mumma et al (2009) methane plume would have to be an extraordinary event. Even if the Mumma et al (2009) is in error by an order of magnitude as proposed by Zahnle (2011), other measurements in the 10s of ppbv of methane exist (see Table 1 of Fries et al, 2016). Therefore, a meteor shower delivering three or four orders of mass more than the typical flux is needed to generate methane in the tens of ppbv as Crismani et al (2017) state.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…First, I would like to extend thanks to Crismani et al for their commentary, which highlights an important uncertainty acknowledged in Fries et al (2016), namely whether the total mass of infall material required to produce the observed methane is on par with that available from meteor showers. I would like to disagree on two points presented in the letter, and then discuss the implications of their findings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations