findings revealed that none of the samples exhibited any evidence of inflammation but, rather, degenerative changes in the fascia. 22 Perhaps this is the reason why corticosteroid injections have been found to be ineffective and, in fact, often result in serious side effects, including plantar fascia ruptures. 1,34 Considering the ongoing debate regarding proper nomenclature, for the purpose of this study we will use the term "plantar heel pain" to refer to the presentation of our clinical population.It has been reported that approximately 1 in 10 individuals will develop chronic P lantar heel pain is commonly referred to as "plantar fasciitis"; however, recent research suggests that the condition manifests itself as a noninflammatory degenerative process, thus the term "fasciosis" may be more appropriate. To compare the effectiveness of 2 different conservative management approaches in the treatment of plantar heel pain.There is insufficient evidence to establish the optimal physical therapy management strategies for patients with heel pain, and little evidence of long-term effects.Patients with a primary report of plantar heel pain underwent a standard evaluation and completed a number of patient self-report questionnaires, including the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). Patients were randomly assigned to be treated with either an electrophysical agents and exercise (EPAX) or a manual physical therapy and exercise (MTEX) approach. Outcomes of interest were captured at baseline and at 4-week and 6-month follow-ups. The primary aim (effects of treatment on pain and disability) was examined with a mixed-model analysis of variance (ANOVA). The hypothesis of interest was the 2-way interaction (group by time).Sixty subjects (mean [SD] age, 48.4 [8.7] years) satisfied the eligibility criteria, agreed to participate, and were randomized into the EPAX (n = 30) or MTEX group (n = 30). The overall group-by-time interaction for the ANOVA was statistically significant for the LEFS (P = .002), FAAM (P = .005), and pain (P = .043). Between-group differences favored the MTEX group at both 4-week (difference in LEFS, 13.5; 95% CI: 6.3, 20.8) and 6-month (9.9; 95% CI: 1.2, 18.6) follow-ups.The results of this study provide evidence that MTEX is a superior management approach over an EPAX approach in the management of individuals with plantar heel pain at both the short-and long-term follow-ups. Future studies should examine the contribution of the different components of the exercise and manual physical therapy programs. Therapy, level 1b.