2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2010.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A combined study of behavior and Fos expression in limbic structures after re-testing Wistar rats in the elevated plus-maze

Abstract: The elevated plus-maze is an animal model used to study anxiety. In a second session, rats show a reduction in the exploratory behavior even when the two sessions are separated by intervals as large as 7 days. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the reduction in the exploratory behavior is maintained after intervals larger than 7 days. Additionally, we aimed at investigating eventual correlations between behaviors in the plus-maze and activation of limbic structures as measured by Fos prote… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Male rats were not tested in that study, and we know of no previous studies that examine sex differences in activation of PIR during social interaction. Activation of the piriform cortex has also been shown to be produced by exposure to the elevated plus maze, suggesting sensitivity to anxiogenic stimuli (Galvis-Alonso et al, 2010), and social interaction is often used as a test of anxiety (Seth and File, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Male rats were not tested in that study, and we know of no previous studies that examine sex differences in activation of PIR during social interaction. Activation of the piriform cortex has also been shown to be produced by exposure to the elevated plus maze, suggesting sensitivity to anxiogenic stimuli (Galvis-Alonso et al, 2010), and social interaction is often used as a test of anxiety (Seth and File, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, maze-experienced rats display significantly more neuronal cFos activation within the ventral mPFC, BLA and central amygdala after EPMZ re-testing compared with cFos activation displayed by maze-na € õve rats after initial testing (Albrechet-Souza et al, 2008;Albrechet-Souza & Brandao, 2010). It has been suggested that the reduced exploratory behavior and open arm activities displayed by rats during maze re-exposure is indicative of learned avoidance, and can be used to assess memory acquisition and retention (Bertoglio & Carobrez, 2000, 2004Albrechet-Souza & Brandao, 2010;Galvis-Alonsoa et al, 2010). In the present study, DSAP lesions had no significant impact on the development of avoidance learning that presumably underlies the qualitative shift in emotional state suggested by behavioral changes between Test 1 and Test 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a second experiment, we examined whether loss of vlBST‐projecting NA neurons alters the pronounced effect of prior maze experience to alter maze behavior during a subsequent test, a phenomenon observed previously in non‐lesioned rats (File et al ., , ; Treit et al ., ; Bertoglio & Carobrez, , ; Albrechet‐Souza & Brandao, ). It has been suggested that the reduced exploratory behavior and open arm activities displayed by rats during maze re‐exposure is indicative of learned avoidance, and can be used to assess memory acquisition and retention (Bertoglio & Carobrez, , ; Albrechet‐Souza & Brandao, ; Galvis‐Alonsoa et al ., ). Therefore, we sought to determine whether vlBST‐projecting NA neurons participate in this process of emotional learning and memory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A prior maze trial provides a baseline for the acquisition and retention of memories because experience-dependent behavioral changes can be observed (GALVIS-ALONSO et al, 2010). We have shown the histaminergic system participation via H 1 receptors on emotional memory modulation, using a Trial1/Trial 2 (T1/T2) protocol in an EPM test (GIANLORENÇO et al, 2012;SERAFIM et al, 2012;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%