Abstract:We present a fast algorithm for the efficient estimation of rare-event (buffer overflow) probabilities in queueing networks. Our algorithm presents a combined version of two well known methods: the splitting and the cross-entropy (CE) method. We call the new method SPLITCE. In this method, the optimal change of measure (importance sampling) is determined adaptively by using the CE method. Simulation results for a single queue and queueing networks of the ATM-type are presented. Our numerical results demonstrat… Show more
“…Although there is a vast literature on the splitting method (see Botev and Kroese, 2008;Garvels, 2000;Garvels and Rubinstein, 2002;Lagnoux-Renaudie, 2010;Melas, 1997;L'Ecuyer et al, 2007;Rubinstein, 2010), we follow Rubinstein (2010) and present some background on the splitting method, also called in Rubinstein (2010) the cloning method. The main idea is to design a sequential sampling plan, with a view of decomposing a "difficult" counting problem defined on some set * into a number of "easy" ones associated with a sequence of related sets 0 1 m and such that m = * .…”
Section: Introduction: the Splitting Methodsmentioning
We show how a simple modification of the splitting method based on Gibbs sampler can be efficiently used for decision making in the sense that one can efficiently decide whether or not a given set of integer program constraints has at least one feasible solution. We also show how to incorporate the classic capture-recapture method into the splitting algorithm in order to obtain a low variance estimator for the counting quantity representing, say the number of feasible solutions on the set of the constraints of an integer program. We finally present numerical with with both, the decision making and the capture-recapture estimators and show their superiority as compared to the conventional one, while solving quite general decision making and counting ones, like the satisfiability problems.
“…Although there is a vast literature on the splitting method (see Botev and Kroese, 2008;Garvels, 2000;Garvels and Rubinstein, 2002;Lagnoux-Renaudie, 2010;Melas, 1997;L'Ecuyer et al, 2007;Rubinstein, 2010), we follow Rubinstein (2010) and present some background on the splitting method, also called in Rubinstein (2010) the cloning method. The main idea is to design a sequential sampling plan, with a view of decomposing a "difficult" counting problem defined on some set * into a number of "easy" ones associated with a sequence of related sets 0 1 m and such that m = * .…”
Section: Introduction: the Splitting Methodsmentioning
We show how a simple modification of the splitting method based on Gibbs sampler can be efficiently used for decision making in the sense that one can efficiently decide whether or not a given set of integer program constraints has at least one feasible solution. We also show how to incorporate the classic capture-recapture method into the splitting algorithm in order to obtain a low variance estimator for the counting quantity representing, say the number of feasible solutions on the set of the constraints of an integer program. We finally present numerical with with both, the decision making and the capture-recapture estimators and show their superiority as compared to the conventional one, while solving quite general decision making and counting ones, like the satisfiability problems.
“…For relevant references on the splitting method see [2], [4], [5], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], which contain extensive valuable material as well as a detailed list of references. Recently, the connection between splitting for Markovian processes and interacting particle methods based on the Feynman-Kac model with a rigorous framework for mathematical analysis has been established in Del…”
Section: Introduction: the Splitting Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the sake of clarity, we will focus first on g ε as per (8). With this function, for a given ε, we can split the region explored by the Gibbs sampler in several small (sub) hypercubes or hyperrectangles, as shown schematically in Figure 1.…”
Section: Estimate Of the Rare-event Cardinalitymentioning
We present an enhanced version of the splitting method, called the smoothed splitting method (SSM), for counting associated with complex 1 Corresponding author (http://iew3.technion.ac.il/Home/Users/ierrr01.phtml). 1 sets, such as the set defined by the constraints of an integer program and in particular for counting the number of satisfiability assignments. Like the conventional splitting algorithms, ours uses a sequential sampling plan to decompose a "difficult" problem into a sequence of "easy" ones. The main difference between SSM and splitting is that it works with an auxiliary sequence of continuous sets instead of the original discrete ones. The rationale of doing so is that continuous sets are easier to handle. We show that while the proposed method and its standard splitting counterpart are similar in their CPU time and variability, the former is more robust and more flexible than the latter.
“…Darwin's Finch Data from Yuguo Chen, Persi Diaconis, Susan P. Holmes, and Jun S. Liu: m = 12, n = 17 with row and columns sums r = (14, 13, 14, 10, 12, 2, 10, 1, 10, 11, 6, 2), c = (3, 3, 10, 9,9,7,8,9,7,8,2,9,3,6,8,2,2).…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.