2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1474-6670(17)37409-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Combined Qualitative/Quantitative Approach for Fault Isolation in Continuous Dynamic Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If a fault produces an immediate change in the residual, i.e., a discontinuity at the point of fault occurrence, then the magnitude symbol will be + or -, otherwise it will be 0. In previous work, we have proven that for parametric faults, the first change and subsequent slope provide all of the discriminatory evidence for qualitative fault isolation in dynamic systems [Manders et al, 2000]. Therefore, our fault signatures include two symbols: the magnitude change and slope of the residual signal.…”
Section: Fault Signaturesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…If a fault produces an immediate change in the residual, i.e., a discontinuity at the point of fault occurrence, then the magnitude symbol will be + or -, otherwise it will be 0. In previous work, we have proven that for parametric faults, the first change and subsequent slope provide all of the discriminatory evidence for qualitative fault isolation in dynamic systems [Manders et al, 2000]. Therefore, our fault signatures include two symbols: the magnitude change and slope of the residual signal.…”
Section: Fault Signaturesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…More formally, a qualitative fault signature is expressed as: Given a fault f , and measurement m, a qualitative fault signature, F S(f m), of order k, is an ordered (k + 1)-tuple consisting of the predicted magnitude and 1 st through k th order time-derivative effects of a residual signal of measurement m, defined from the time point of occurrence of fault f , expressed as qualitative values: below normal (−), normal (0), and above normal (+). Typically k is chosen to be the order of the system [Manders et al, 2000].…”
Section: The Tcg Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[Pulido and Alonso, 2004] and analysis of temporal causal graphs [Mosterman and Biswas, 1999] [Manders et al, 2000] for diagnosis of continuous systems. These methods are based on the structural analysis of dynamic models, much like the ARR schemes developed by the FDI community.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming that the system output is continuous and continuously differentiable except at the points of fault occurrence, the transient response after fault occurrence can be approximated by a Taylor series expansion [12]. Measurement transients are described using the magnitude and the derivative values of the residual signal [8].…”
Section: Qualitative Fault Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%