2021
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.624240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Combined Long Noncoding RNA Signature as a Candidate Prognostic Biomarker for Ovarian Cancer

Abstract: AimsDysregulated long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) contributing to ovarian cancer (OC) development may serve as prognostic biomarker. We aimed to explore a lncRNA signature to serve as prognostic biomarker of OC.MethodsUnivariate Cox regression was conducted on the lncRNA expression dataset from the TCGA cohort, and 246 genes significantly associated with survival were retained for building a model. A random forest survival model was carried out, and a model was developed using 6 genes with the highest frequency. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The samples were divided into three categories (vascular H, vascular M and vascular L) by the K-MEANS method. Patients’ OS and RS were analyzed using KM methods and plotted using the “survminer” package [ 13 ]. The log-rank test was employed to compare survival differences with p value < 0.05.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The samples were divided into three categories (vascular H, vascular M and vascular L) by the K-MEANS method. Patients’ OS and RS were analyzed using KM methods and plotted using the “survminer” package [ 13 ]. The log-rank test was employed to compare survival differences with p value < 0.05.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LncRNAs were divided into two groups by median: high-risk and low-risk groups. To clarify the specific molecular mechanism of these lncRNAs in HCC, GO and KEGG analyses were performed to compare the difference between high-risk and low-risk groups [ 13 ]. It was considered as significant differences in gene enrichment when | NES |≥ 1, FDR q -value < 0.25 and NOM p value < 0.01.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%