2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsep.2023.101692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A combined kinetic analysis for thermal characteristics and reaction mechanism based on non-isothermal experiments: The case of poly(vinyl alcohol) pyrolysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(7 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wang et al (2018) [ 18 ] also highlighted that the PVA pyrolysis can be considered as two steps; one between 230 and 320 °C for elimination reactions, followed between 320 and 500 °C for chain scission and cyclization reactions. For instance, Zhao et al (2023) [ 16 ] elucidated that the TG and DTG curves have very similar behavior with two peak reactions, (550–660 K) and (700–800 K), if they are compared with our curves for the common heating rate 20 K min −1 . The difference in the characteristic temperatures between the published papers could be attributed to the experimental conditions, sample source and size, operating pressure, and carrier gas flow rate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Wang et al (2018) [ 18 ] also highlighted that the PVA pyrolysis can be considered as two steps; one between 230 and 320 °C for elimination reactions, followed between 320 and 500 °C for chain scission and cyclization reactions. For instance, Zhao et al (2023) [ 16 ] elucidated that the TG and DTG curves have very similar behavior with two peak reactions, (550–660 K) and (700–800 K), if they are compared with our curves for the common heating rate 20 K min −1 . The difference in the characteristic temperatures between the published papers could be attributed to the experimental conditions, sample source and size, operating pressure, and carrier gas flow rate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…By checking Figure 2 a–e, it has been noticed that while moving from 0.1 conversion to 0.7, the slope which is a function of the activation energy, are increasing, and this observation has been confirmed by changing the average activation energy values from 89 kJ mol −1 at conversion 0.1 to 280 kJ mol −1 at conversion 0.7 with average 145 kJ mol −1 . This high value of activation energy value at high conversion is attributed to the beginning of the second reaction which has not been included in this calculation (Zhao et al (2023) [ 16 ]). Table 6 presents activation energy from three published papers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations