2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2006.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A combined immunofluorescence and fluorescent in situ hybridization assay for single cell analyses of dental plaque microorganisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of PCR‐based assays for the detection of specific periodontopathic bacteria is becoming state of the art but might lead to an overestimation of the actual bacterial load. Previously proposed solutions using ethidium monoazide or PMA intercalation, combined immunofluorescence and fluorescence in situ hybridization or RNA‐oligonucleotide quantification have proven their validity. Yet, most of those methods require samples to be immediately processed, special expertise and equipment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of PCR‐based assays for the detection of specific periodontopathic bacteria is becoming state of the art but might lead to an overestimation of the actual bacterial load. Previously proposed solutions using ethidium monoazide or PMA intercalation, combined immunofluorescence and fluorescence in situ hybridization or RNA‐oligonucleotide quantification have proven their validity. Yet, most of those methods require samples to be immediately processed, special expertise and equipment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, as we are dealing with a pool of many different bacterial species, a single preservation method might not be suitable and/or could be selective for certain species. Other possible solutions such as combined immunofluorescence and fluorescence in situ hybridization or RNA‐oligonucleotide quantification appear valuable, but technically demanding and therefore more suitable for research purposes than clinical application. Here we propose a simplified RNA method to provide basic insight into the viable microbial load within a patient's plaque sample.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probe was used at a final concentration of 5 ng ؒ ml -1 in the presence of 30% formamide in the hybridization buffer. FISH was performed in 50-ml plastic centrifuge tubes at 46 ° C as described [Thurnheer et al, 2001] except for the following modifications [Gmur and Luthi-Schaller, 2007]: (1) the slides were not dehydrated in ethanol prior to hybridization; (2) sections were covered for 60 min at 37 ° C with protectRNA RNase inhibitor (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo., USA, diluted 1: 500 in 0.9% NaCl) prior to hybridization.…”
Section: Fluorescent In Situ Hybridizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluorescence intensity depends on cellular ribosome content, in situ probe accessibility to the probe target region, and rRNA stability [25]. Several procedures to maximize the performance of FISH probes have been described [15,16,26,27]. They alter the 3-dimensional structure of the target region by using helper probes, optimize probe length and hybridization conditions, improve binding affinity by modifying the probes' backbone with LNA substitutions, or inhibit enzymatic rRNA degradation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve cell wall permeability each well selected for FISH of lactobacilli was treated individually at room temperature first for 5 min with 9 μl of lysozyme (1 mg ml -1 ; Sigma-Aldrich L-7651) and achromopeptidase (1 mg ml -1 ; Sigma-Aldrich A-7550) in Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) with 5 mM EDTA, and then for 30 min with 9 μ l of lipase (Sigma-Aldrich L-1754; at 25 mg ml -1 in water the lipase suspension was centrifuged for 5 min at 16'000 × g after which the supernatant was used). Thereafter, to limit unspecific FISH probe binding all wells were covered for 30 min at 37 °C with 9 μ l of PBS containing Denhardt's solution (Fluka 30915; diluted 1:50) in the presence of protectRNA RNase inhibitor (Sigma-Aldrich R-7397; diluted 1:500) [15,16,26,27]. At the end of the respective incubation periods the solutions were carefully aspirated and the slides briefly washed in wash-buffer (0.9% NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20, 0.01% NaN 3 ), dipped in water, and air-dried.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%