2023
DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2023.2192801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A combined in silico approaches of 2D-QSAR, molecular docking, molecular dynamics and ADMET prediction of anti-cancer inhibitor activity for actinonin derivatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pharmacokinetic pro le refers to how the drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted, while toxicological pro le reveals the potential adverse drug reactions. These parameters, collectively known as ADMET parameters, can be determined by computer models instead of experimental procedures, which save time and reduces the risk of hazards [70,71].…”
Section: Pharmacokinetic and Toxicological Pro Le Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pharmacokinetic pro le refers to how the drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted, while toxicological pro le reveals the potential adverse drug reactions. These parameters, collectively known as ADMET parameters, can be determined by computer models instead of experimental procedures, which save time and reduces the risk of hazards [70,71].…”
Section: Pharmacokinetic and Toxicological Pro Le Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of molecular docking is a crucial tool in drug discovery as it aids in predicting the binding of a ligand to its target protein [21] . In this study, the technique of molecular docking was employed using the Virtual Molegro Docker software [22] to determine the optimal positioning of four different compounds, namely Apigenin (API), Luteolin (lut), Naringenin (nari) and Quercetin (que) figure 1, with respect to two different prostaglandin proteins (PDB ID: 3DWW Resolution: 3.50 Å and PDB ID: 3LN1 Resolution: 2.40 Å), which were retrieved from the Protein Data Bank (RCSB) (figure 1).…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%