2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10586-018-1735-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A combined GPS UWB and MARG locationing algorithm for indoor and outdoor mixed scenario

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to UWB system adopts nanosecond or sub-nanosecond pulse signal to ranging, UWB signal has strong anti-multipath ability and provides more stable positioning result. It is widely used in many kinds of localization scenarios, and the accuracy of UWB location system can reach centimeter level [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to UWB system adopts nanosecond or sub-nanosecond pulse signal to ranging, UWB signal has strong anti-multipath ability and provides more stable positioning result. It is widely used in many kinds of localization scenarios, and the accuracy of UWB location system can reach centimeter level [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most people cannot live without the location service and the navigation system based on GPS (Global Position System) in their daily life. Obviously, outdoor localization technology has been relatively mature, and many mobile devices also refer to outdoor location technology [1,2,3,4]. Due to the particularity of indoor environment, the GPS signal cannot directly meet the requirements of indoor localization service.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Segura et al [17] used the ultra wideband (UWB) system for indoor navigation and achieved a positioning error of 20 cm (the anchor method by Großwindhager et al [18] also showed an error of 20 cm); however, this method is more difficult to apply (comparing to BLE and WiFi-based methods) due to the requirement of having specific equipment, which may not be available to regular users. Zhang et al [19] proposed the use of a combination of GPS, UWB, and MARG (magnetic, angular rate, and gravity), achieving a positioning error is 3.2 m, which might not be acceptable for a blind person. Zhou et al [20] proposed a combined method based on images from a smartphone camera capturing the surrounding scene and pedestrian dead reckoning (PDR) to determine the pedestrian’s trajectory with an accuracy of about 0.56 m. Using embedded inertial sensors [21] and PDR [22] by updating the current position through measuring the length and title of each step, enabled reaching an error of 1.96 m. A similar multisensory approach improved this up to 1.46 m [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%