2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10237-016-0817-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A combined experimental atomic force microscopy-based nanoindentation and computational modeling approach to unravel the key contributors to the time-dependent mechanical behavior of single cells

Abstract: Cellular responses to mechanical stimuli are influenced by the mechanical properties of cells and the surrounding tissue matrix. Cells exhibit viscoelastic behavior in response to an applied stress. This has been attributed to fluid flow-dependent and flow-independent mechanisms. However, the particular mechanism that controls the local time-dependent behavior of cells is unknown. Here, a combined approach of experimental AFM nanoindentation with computational modeling is proposed, taking into account complex … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, different non-linear models can be used to accurately describe osteocyte behavior under dynamic loading. This is commensurate with studies that use visco-hyperelastic, poro-hyperelastic or even poro-visco-hyperelastic descriptions of cell behavior [ 90 , 91 ]. Sophisticated continuum models are useful to accurately quantify the stiffness of healthy and diseased cells [ 92 ] However, they fall short in describing mechanosensing.…”
Section: Finite Element Models Of Single Cellssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Thus, different non-linear models can be used to accurately describe osteocyte behavior under dynamic loading. This is commensurate with studies that use visco-hyperelastic, poro-hyperelastic or even poro-visco-hyperelastic descriptions of cell behavior [ 90 , 91 ]. Sophisticated continuum models are useful to accurately quantify the stiffness of healthy and diseased cells [ 92 ] However, they fall short in describing mechanosensing.…”
Section: Finite Element Models Of Single Cellssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Viscous properties were also considered in other works, Liu et al , proposed a viscoelastic finite element method (FEM) model, which accounted for both cell elasticity and viscoelasticity for cell AFM nanoindentation [21]. An approach of experimental AFM nanoindentation and FEM modelling was proposed by Florea et al , viscohyperelastic model was employed in their study for parameter analysis of fluid flow through the cell membrane [22]. The geometry of AFM tip is one of the most important factors in the proper characterisation of mechanical properties of cell [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The horizontal axis data is denoted the Z-axis location of the AFM probe, and a negative value indicates the location is above the petri-dish surface referenced by the previous scanning result. The stress-relaxation behaviour of the deformed biological cells causes the discrepancy of the detected forces before and after the pause [28].…”
Section: Central Indentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from nano-indentation, various forms of mechanical stimuli, such as indentation, compression and elongation, were simulated by the hyperelastic models [22][23][24][25][26][27]. Many other non-linear elastic theories, such as viscoelastic and poroelastic, have also been investigated to characterize the time dependent stress-relaxation behaviour of the cell during nano-indentation [28]. Because of the versatility of the multi-layer hyperelastic model in describing the mechanical response of living cells under mechanical stimuli [25][26][27], it is adopted in this paper to simulate the continuum components of the cell during central indentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%