2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c03365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Combined Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of Arene-Supported Actinide and Ytterbium Tetraphenolate Complexes

Abstract: Modular tetraphenolate ligands tethered with a protective arene platform (para-phenyl or para-terphenyl) are used to support mononuclear An(IV) (An = Th, U) complexes with an exceptionally large and open axial coordination site at the metal. The base-free complexes and a series of neutral donor adducts were synthesized and characterized by spectroscopies and single-crystal Xray diffraction. Anionic Th(IV) -ate complexes with an additional axial aryloxide ligand were also synthesized and characterized. The para… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Th–C arene distances are in a narrow range of 2.952(4)–2.994(4) Å with an average of 2.976(4) Å, indicating that the anchoring arene is η 6 -bound to thorium. Notably, the Th–C centroid distance of 2.6283(4) Å is significantly shorter than that of the thorium­(IV) complex of neutral benzene [(XA 2 )­Th­(CH 2 SiMe 3 )­(η 6 -C 6 H 6 )]­[B­(C 6 F 5 ) 4 ] [2.9501(9) Å; XA 2 = 4,5-bis­(2,6-di- iso -propylanilido)-2,7-di- tert -butyl-9,9-dimethylxanthene] and close to the shortest Th–C centroid distance documented in the literature for thorium­(IV) neutral arene complexes [2.6199(14) Å in ( p TP)­Th­(N 3 SiMe 3 ); p Tp = para -xylenetetra­(3- tert -butyl-5-methyl-2-phenoxide)], suggesting nonnegligible thorium–arene interaction in 1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Th–C arene distances are in a narrow range of 2.952(4)–2.994(4) Å with an average of 2.976(4) Å, indicating that the anchoring arene is η 6 -bound to thorium. Notably, the Th–C centroid distance of 2.6283(4) Å is significantly shorter than that of the thorium­(IV) complex of neutral benzene [(XA 2 )­Th­(CH 2 SiMe 3 )­(η 6 -C 6 H 6 )]­[B­(C 6 F 5 ) 4 ] [2.9501(9) Å; XA 2 = 4,5-bis­(2,6-di- iso -propylanilido)-2,7-di- tert -butyl-9,9-dimethylxanthene] and close to the shortest Th–C centroid distance documented in the literature for thorium­(IV) neutral arene complexes [2.6199(14) Å in ( p TP)­Th­(N 3 SiMe 3 ); p Tp = para -xylenetetra­(3- tert -butyl-5-methyl-2-phenoxide)], suggesting nonnegligible thorium–arene interaction in 1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to uranium, thorium–arene interactions are much less studied and thorium arene complexes are scarce. In 2003, Gambarotta and co-workers reported the synthesis of thorium complexes of naphthalene dianion and their reactivity as thorium­(II) synthons. , Later on, a handful of thorium­(IV) complexes with either inter- or intramolecular arene coordination were reported. , Notably, all attempts to reduce thorium­(IV) arene complexes led to ligand-based reduction with the formation of thorium­(IV) complexes of reduced arenes (Figure a). ,, Such reduction reactivity is in contrast to that of uranium­(IV) analogues, which usually result in uranium-centered reduction. ,, The different reactivity between thorium and uranium may be attributed to the facts that thorium­(IV) is more difficult to reduce than uranium­(IV) and genuine thorium­(III) and thorium­(II) complexes are much rarer compared to their uranium­(III) and uranium­(II) counterparts. Furthermore, a comparison between thorium and uranium inverse-sandwich arene complexes shows that thorium has less tendency to form δ-bonding interactions with arenes than uranium …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turning to discussion of the 2 M and 3 M structures in the broader context of previously reported literature, the most noteworthy feature of these complexes is the metal-arene h 6interactions present. Examples of f-element interactions with formally neutral arenes for these metal ions are reported, with a handful of structurally veried reports for uranium, 30,36,41,42,46,47,[51][52][53]55,56,[78][79][80][81] six for cerium, [82][83][84][85][86][87] one for neptunium 21 and none for plutonium at the time of writing. It should be noted that this type of interaction is also known for several rare-earth and lanthanide compounds, though here we focus on comparisons to similar f-element complexes (Ce, U, Np).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Of note, f-block metal complexes which contain metal-arene interactions have proven to be highly valuable for understanding bonding and the role of valence orbitals for lanthanides and actinides. [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] Among this class of molecules, those which feature neutral arene coordinating motifs are of particular interest as these may exhibit covalent participation of the metal in the form of p/d/4 type interactions. 31,[33][34][35][36][37] Such complexes have potential to provide new key insight into f-block bonding modes as has been the case in other areas of the periodic table; for example, the seminal discovery of bis(benzene)chromium, Cr(h 6 -C 6 H 6 ) 2 , by E. O. Fischer, which revolutionized the understanding of transition metal chemistry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%