2015
DOI: 10.2147/ijgm.s81938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A combined continuous and interval aerobic training improves metabolic syndrome risk factors in men

Abstract: Individuals with metabolic syndrome have significantly higher risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes leading to premature death mortality. Metabolic syndrome has a complex etiology; thus, it may require a combined and multi-targeted aerobic exercise regimen to improve risk factors associated with it. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of combined continuous and interval aerobic training on patients with metabolic syndrome. Thirty adult male with metabolic syndrome (54±8 yea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
10

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
4
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Two other studies had duplicated data, 12 were not randomised controlled trials, 14 studies did not apply HIIT in their interventions, 10 did not include participants with METS, and 3 did not have enough data to calculate effect size. Finally, 10 studies that met the selection criteria were identified [ 44 53 ]. Figure 1 shows the flow chart of the selection process of studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two other studies had duplicated data, 12 were not randomised controlled trials, 14 studies did not apply HIIT in their interventions, 10 did not include participants with METS, and 3 did not have enough data to calculate effect size. Finally, 10 studies that met the selection criteria were identified [ 44 53 ]. Figure 1 shows the flow chart of the selection process of studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total sample size was 355 in the HIIT intervention groups and 174 in the control groups. Two studies included only men [ 51 ], one study included only women [ 44 ] and eight trials included men and women [ 45 – 50 , 52 , 53 ]. The length of the HIIT interventions ranged from 3 to 24 weeks and the weekly training frequency was 3 sessions per week for 9 trials [ 44 51 ], 4 sessions per week in one trial [ 53 ] and 5 sessions per week in another trial [ 54 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Em relação aos efeitos do TAI na pressão arterial, os achados de Stensvold et al 10 confirmaram os mesmos efeitos, com melhora de aproximadamente 6 mmHg na pressão arterial sistólica, sem significância estatística. Já no estudo de Sari-Sarraf et al 6 nota-se melhora significativa da pressão arterial sistólica no grupo TAI, em que foi observado aumento da produção de óxido nítrico (vaso dilatador), porém essa indicação só foi possível entre as 8ª e 16ª semanas, a intensidade do exercício foi iniciada a uma carga de 60% da RCF e depois foi aumentada para 75% mantendo-se até o final. A não obtenção do resultado esperado pode estar relacionado à intensidade do exercício, pois em nosso estudo iniciamos o treinamento em intensidade baixa alcançando alta intensidade apenas no final da intervenção.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Por outro lado, os resultados observados do IMC revelam aumento no grupo controle e redução do grupo TAI, não significante estatisticamente. Porém, nos estudos de Sari-Sarraf et al 6 e Stensvold et al 10 é descrita a melhora do IMC dos grupos TAI e TRC que pode ter se dado pela alta intensidade dos treinamentos, durante o tempo de intervenção. Mostrando que a alta intensidade foi determinante para a diminuição do IMC.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation