“…The authors postulated that the nanofiber-based formulations outperformed the alum-based control due to their ability to more effectively control the release of antigen. Furthermore, the formulation incorporating positively charged nanofibers elicited a long-lasting antibody Filamentous Peptides CD8 T cell stimulation without adjuvant [71] Filamentous gel Peptides T cell response, tumor growth [52] Filamentous gel Peptides CD8 T cell activation, proliferation [54] Filamentous gel PGA-chitosan Antigen specific cross-presentation, titers, adjuvanticity [72] Filamentous gel, spherical PEG-PPS Morphology transition, release [73] Filamentous scaffold Peptides CD8 T cell, memory, effector response [57] Filamentous, flat pSarc-LLAIB IgM production, growth inhibition, ligand density [46] Filamentous, flat, spherical Silver Uptake; mast cell degranulation [43] Filamentous, spherical PEG-PEE; PEG-PCL Uptake, circulation [32] Filamentous, spherical PEG-PPS Biodistribution; lymph nodes, spleen [45] Flat MoS2 Payload uptake, stimulation [61] Flat Graphene oxide Antigen display, uptake, endosomal escape [67] Raspberry, gibbous, spherical Polypyrrole Targeting, MRI visualization [50] Rod Silica Biodistribution, excretion [34] Rod, cubic, spherical Gold Uptake, antibody production, adjuvanticity [56] Rod, spherical Silica Renal excretion [36] Rod, spherical PAA, PVP, PEI Uptake, antibody titers [41] Rod response that failed to decline even after 28 weeks. This enhanced potency occurred due to an increase in antigen uptake by dendritic cells, which the authors attributed to the effect of the positive surface charge of the D-peptide nanofibers.…”