2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.disc.2007.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A combinatorial proof of the Rayleigh formula for graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The corresponding entries of the third and fourth columns describe the pair (A , B ) associated with (A, B) that contributes to equation (3) for H. It is easy to see that the pairs (A, B) and (A , B ) have the same type. Thus, the construction described in Table 1 gives a 1:1 correspondence (A, B) ↔ (A , B ) that proves equations ( 4) and (5). Therefore, we have verified equation (3) for G in Case 3.…”
Section: Rhs(g) = Rhs(h(ab)) + Rhs(h(ac)) + Rhs(h(bc)) (5)supporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The corresponding entries of the third and fourth columns describe the pair (A , B ) associated with (A, B) that contributes to equation (3) for H. It is easy to see that the pairs (A, B) and (A , B ) have the same type. Thus, the construction described in Table 1 gives a 1:1 correspondence (A, B) ↔ (A , B ) that proves equations ( 4) and (5). Therefore, we have verified equation (3) for G in Case 3.…”
Section: Rhs(g) = Rhs(h(ab)) + Rhs(h(ac)) + Rhs(h(bc)) (5)supporting
confidence: 60%
“…By the induction hypothesis, equation (3) holds for each of the graphs H(ab), H(ac), and H(bc), so that (4) and (5) suffice to prove equation (3) for G.…”
Section: Rhs(g) = Rhs(h(ab)) + Rhs(h(ac)) + Rhs(h(bc)) (5)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This theorem is an epidemiological equivalent of a much-studied property of electrical networks, known as Rayleigh monotonicity [13][14][15]. Rayleigh monotonicity describes the effect of individual resistors in a network on the "effective resistance" of the entire network.…”
Section: Monotonicity Of the Sir Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Take any partition (F 1 , F 2 ) that is counted in A ++ , A −− or 2A +− and delete from it the edges i and j, F ♥ l = F l − {i, j}. It is immediate to see that 1 Refixing the orientation will not change the validity of the Equation 2, since…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%