2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2004.09198
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A combinatorial expansion of vertical-strip LLT polynomials in the basis of elementary symmetric functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We now relate increasing spanning forests of an indifference graph G to orientations of G, following [Ale20] and [AS20]. We say that an oriented edge − → uv of G is oriented to the right if u < v, and oriented to the left otherwise.…”
Section: Relation With the Chromatic Quasisymmetric Function And Llt ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now relate increasing spanning forests of an indifference graph G to orientations of G, following [Ale20] and [AS20]. We say that an oriented edge − → uv of G is oriented to the right if u < v, and oriented to the left otherwise.…”
Section: Relation With the Chromatic Quasisymmetric Function And Llt ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building from this intuition, it is possible to define the operation of plethysm in a way that extends to a definition f [g] valid for any symmetric functions f and g. This operation is fundamental to modern symmetric function theory research; many problems and results are best stated and studied through plethystic simplifications, such as questions related to LLT polynomials [1,2], Macdonald polynomials [8,11], and Hall-Littlewood polynomials [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D'Adderio [5] used recurrences in terms of Schröder paths to prove that the shifted verticalstrip LLT polynomial G λ (x; q + 1) is a positive linear combination of elementary symmetric functions. Alexandersson conjectured [1] and then proved with Sulzgruber [2] the explicit combinatorial formula (1.4) G λ (x; q + 1) = θ∈O(P )…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%