A Combination of Nootropic Ingredients (CAF+) Is Not Better than Caffeine in Improving Cognitive Functions

Abstract

Many nootropic compounds claim to have positive effects on cognitive performance. In this study, we tested the effects of the nootropic compound CAF+ on cognitive functioning. CAF+ contains a combination of ingredients that has separately shown to boost cognitive performance, including caffeine, l-theanine, vinpocetine, l-tyrosine, and vitamin B 6 /B 12 . We examined whether CAF+ would improve cognitive functions in healthy young participants, and whether it would be more effective than caffeine. We used a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled three-way cross-over design to examine the performance of 21 healthy young participants on a test battery aimed to measure memory performance, attention, and sensorimotor speed. Our main outcome measure was participant's performance on the Verbal Learning Test (VLT). Subjective alertness, heart rate, and blood pressure were also monitored. Participants were tested at 30 and 90 min after treatment. We found that after 90 min, the delayed recall performance on the VLT after caffeine was better than after CAF+ treatment. Further, caffeine, but not CAF+, improved the performance in a working memory task. In a complex choice reaction task caffeine improved the speed of responding. Subjective alertness was increased as a result of CAF+ at 30 min after administration. Only caffeine increased diastolic blood pressure. We conclude that in healthy young students, caffeine improves memory performance and sensorimotor speed, whereas CAF+ does not affect the cognitive performance at the dose tested.

Cognitive Enhancing Drugs in Sport: Current and Future Concerns

“…Making the investigation of CED more complex, the type of cognitive task, dosage, patterns of use, environmental influences and psychological and physiological state all blur assessment of CED effectiveness (Advokat & Scheithauer, 2013;Bagot & Kaminer, 2014;Caldenhove, Sambeth, Sharma, Woo & Blokland, 2018;d'Angelo, Savulich, & Sahakian, 2017;De Jongh, Bolt, Schermer & Olivier, 2008;Ferretti & Ienca, 2018). Further, CEDs often do not provide the level of effect sought or expected by users (Repantis, Schlattmann, Laisney, & Heuser, 2010).…”

The Matrix Matters: Beverage Carbonation Impacts the Timing of Caffeine Effects on Sustained Attention

“…Although the effects of caffeine on attention are well-acknowledged and despite several attempts at understanding the combined effects of caffeine with other ingredients on cognitive function, greater research is required to determine the role of the vehicle (i.e., the nature of the drink) with which caffeine is administered as this has been shown to affect the impact of caffeine on mood and cognition [ 12 , 13 ].…”

Editorial: One Year of Journal of Cognitive Enhancement

“…The first year of Journal of Cognitive Enhancement included a broad overview of cognitive enhancing methods ranging from nootropic ingredients (Caldenhove et al 2017) to online brain-training games (Bainbridge and Mayer 2017), biofeedback and neurofeedback (Dessy et al 2017), cognitive training (Carretti et al 2017), lifeexperience training (Babcock et al 2017), and video games (Dale and Green 2017). The journal pursues a mechanistically oriented, theory-driven approach that tries to understand and explain individual differences to a degree that allows a comprehensive understanding of how and why a particular intervention enhances (social) cognition.…”