2023
DOI: 10.1088/2058-8585/acb36b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A combination of experimental and numerical method for optimizing the sensitivity of ultra-thin piezoelectric sensor with interdigitated electrodes

Abstract: We report the development of a FE-model for ultra-thin piezoelectric poly(vinylidenetrifluoroethylene) (PVDF-TrFE) sensor with interdigitated electrodes (IDE) which includes the effect of a non-homogenous poling field determined via the combination of experimental and numerical methods. The non-homogenous poling magnitude is estimated by comparing the remanent polarization (Pr) of IDE based device to the Pr of the same material in metal-insulator-metal (MIM) electrode configuration. The non-homogenous poling o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…was used to generate the 2D FE model for the electric field distribution inside the P(VDF‐TrFE) porous aerogel during the poling step. The relative permittivity of the air (pores) was assumed to be 1.0 while for P(VDF‐TrFE) following relative permittivity matrix was used: [ 70 ] []εr11εr21εr33badbreak=0.33em[]7.97.17.9$$\begin{equation}\left[ { \def\eqcellsep{&}\begin{array}{@{}*{3}{c}@{}} {{\varepsilon }_{r11}}&{}&{}\\ {}&{{\varepsilon }_{r21}}&{}\\ {}&{}&{{\varepsilon }_{r33}} \end{array} } \right] = \ \left[ { \def\eqcellsep{&}\begin{array}{@{}*{3}{c}@{}} {7.9}&{}&{}\\ {}&{7.1}&{}\\ {}&{}&{7.9} \end{array} } \right]\end{equation}$$…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…was used to generate the 2D FE model for the electric field distribution inside the P(VDF‐TrFE) porous aerogel during the poling step. The relative permittivity of the air (pores) was assumed to be 1.0 while for P(VDF‐TrFE) following relative permittivity matrix was used: [ 70 ] []εr11εr21εr33badbreak=0.33em[]7.97.17.9$$\begin{equation}\left[ { \def\eqcellsep{&}\begin{array}{@{}*{3}{c}@{}} {{\varepsilon }_{r11}}&{}&{}\\ {}&{{\varepsilon }_{r21}}&{}\\ {}&{}&{{\varepsilon }_{r33}} \end{array} } \right] = \ \left[ { \def\eqcellsep{&}\begin{array}{@{}*{3}{c}@{}} {7.9}&{}&{}\\ {}&{7.1}&{}\\ {}&{}&{7.9} \end{array} } \right]\end{equation}$$…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…was used to generate the 2D FE model for the electric field distribution inside the P(VDF-TrFE) porous aerogel during the poling step. The relative permittivity of the air (pores) was assumed to be 1.0 while for P(VDF-TrFE) following relative permittivity matrix was used: [70] ⎡ ⎢ ⎢ ⎣…”
Section: Polarization Of P(vdf-trfe)mentioning
confidence: 99%