2021
DOI: 10.3390/foods10102455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Combination of Chromatography with Tandem Mass Spectrometry Systems (UPLC-MS/MS and GC-MS/MS), Modified QuEChERS Extraction and Mixed-Mode SPE Clean-Up Method for the Analysis of 656 Pesticide Residues in Rice

Abstract: The emerging ungovernable application of pesticides in rice farming has attracted public concerns as these hazardous chemicals leave long-lasting environmental impacts and cause severe health effects. Here, an optimized analytical method was proposed for the measurement of 656 pesticide residues in rice samples collected in Vietnam. We utilized chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry systems (UPLC-MS/MS and GC-MS/MS) combined with a modified quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe (QuEChERS) extra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, an enhancement in their signals is observed [126]. The determination of 341 and 315 pesticides in rice by LC-MS and GC-MS, respectively, represents a clear example of how signal suppression is usually observed in LC-ESI-MS, while signal enhancement is observed in GC-MS [127]. If the sample treatment proves ineffective in avoiding the matrix effect, it can be compensated for by applying two main strategies: (1) by using matrix-matched calibration curves (i.e., calibration curves of standards prepared in blank matrix extracts), or (2) by using isotopically labeled internal standards (IL-ISs).…”
Section: Matrix Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, an enhancement in their signals is observed [126]. The determination of 341 and 315 pesticides in rice by LC-MS and GC-MS, respectively, represents a clear example of how signal suppression is usually observed in LC-ESI-MS, while signal enhancement is observed in GC-MS [127]. If the sample treatment proves ineffective in avoiding the matrix effect, it can be compensated for by applying two main strategies: (1) by using matrix-matched calibration curves (i.e., calibration curves of standards prepared in blank matrix extracts), or (2) by using isotopically labeled internal standards (IL-ISs).…”
Section: Matrix Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has become the most commonly used method for multi-analyte analysis. [25][26][27] In the previous study, pesticide residues and mycotoxins were detected separately. However, if a modi-ed method was developed to detect both simultaneously, it would signicantly simplify the pretreatment and improve the detection efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results underlined the importance of applying screening methods of the widest possible scope with low limit of detection/limit of quantification (LOD/LOQ) values. For this purpose, good progress has been made in expanding the scope of the methods [ 49 , 50 , 51 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%