Mutualistic interactions, where resources and services are exchanged between partners for mutual benefit, are widespread in the plant kingdom (Bronstein, 2015). Though many mutualisms involve pairwise interactions (James et al., 1994; Nefdt and Compton, 1996; Denison and Kiers, 2011), ecologically important mutualisms also take place among multiple partners (Afkhami et al., 2014). For example, plants can simultaneously interact with a number of microbial mutualists belowground (Larimer et al., 2010) and with pollinator mutualists aboveground (Strauss and Irwin, 2004). These multipartite interactions could be synergistic, such as when stimulation of flower production by inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi increases pollinator visitation (Gange and Smith, 2005; Wolfe et al., 2005), or involve trade-offs, such as when ant-plant mutualisms increase plant biomass by reducing herbivory (Palmer et al., 2008) but reduce fitness by discouraging pollinator visitation (Ohm and Miller, 2014). Because ecological context varies geographically and can alter the benefits and costs of mutualistic interactions (Bronstein, 1994), plant populations are expected to have evolved differences in the degree to which they simultaneously benefit from their partners in a multipartite mutualism (Bronstein, 1994; Heath and Tiffin, 2007). Though population-level variation in host plant response to mutualists is expected, it has rarely been quantified, especially in multipartite mutualisms (Ossler et al., 2015; Batstone et al., 2017). One model system for studying population-level variation in multispecies mutualistic interactions is the tripartite interaction between legumes, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AM) fungi, and nitrogen fixing rhizobia bacteria (Denison and Kiers, 2011). Legumes, like the majority of land plants, are able to form mutualistic relationships with AM fungi (Wang and Qiu, 2006). In the mycorrhizal mutualism,