2000
DOI: 10.1136/sti.76.2.134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A colorimetric detection system for Calymmatobacterium granulomatis

Abstract: Objective: To incorporate the first polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for Calymmatobacterium granulomatis into a colorimetric detection system for use in routine diagnostic laboratories. Methods: A capture oligonucleotide specific for the Klebsiella phoE gene was covalently linked to tosyl activated magnetic beads. Biotinylated phoE PCR products obtained from 14 positive specimens from patients with donovanosis and isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae, K rhinoscleromatis, and K ozaenae were cleaved with HaeII… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…changes in C. granulomatis that eliminated HaeIII restriction sites and differentiated this bacterium from other members of the Enterobacteriaceae family. Whereas Carter et al [7,10] used known positive biopsy samples to validate PCR sensitivity, together with a small number of genital swabs obtained from patients with other conditions to check specificity, we applied a synthetic control and examined DNA from numerous related microorganisms to extend the assay validation data, particularly for H. ducreyi and C. granulomatis, for which limited positive clinical material was available. Limited sequence data is publicly available for C. granulomatis strains; therefore, future studies should aim to sequence the phoE target to ensure the stability of the nucleotide polymorphism over time and around the world.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…changes in C. granulomatis that eliminated HaeIII restriction sites and differentiated this bacterium from other members of the Enterobacteriaceae family. Whereas Carter et al [7,10] used known positive biopsy samples to validate PCR sensitivity, together with a small number of genital swabs obtained from patients with other conditions to check specificity, we applied a synthetic control and examined DNA from numerous related microorganisms to extend the assay validation data, particularly for H. ducreyi and C. granulomatis, for which limited positive clinical material was available. Limited sequence data is publicly available for C. granulomatis strains; therefore, future studies should aim to sequence the phoE target to ensure the stability of the nucleotide polymorphism over time and around the world.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiplex PCR makes best use of limited amounts of clinical material when multiple targets are under investigation, and it improves cost-effectiveness [27]. C. (Klebsiella) granulomatis has not been included in previously reported multiplex PCR assays investigating GUD, despite the existence of a robust PCR technique [7,10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A diagnostic PCR was developed based on the observation that 2 unique base changes in the phoE gene eliminate HaeIII restriction sites enabling clear differentiation from closely related species of Klebsiella 16 . Carter et al have further re® ned their PCR assay into a colorimetric detection system for use in diagnostic laboratories 17 . Firstly this involved linking a capture oligonucleotide speci® c for the Klebsiella phoE gene to tosyl activated magnetic beads.…”
Section: Laboratory Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques are not available at the majority of (reference) laboratories . Alternative diagnostic laboratory methods Ð a PCR-based technique for routine diagnosis of C. granulomatis has been reported 25 . However, this test needs further validation using a suf® cient number of samples from different geographical areas in order to ascertain its value for diagnosing donovanosis.…”
Section: Laboratorymentioning
confidence: 99%