A collaboratively derived international research agenda on legislative science advice

Abstract

The quantity and complexity of scientific and technological information provided to policymakers have been on the rise for decades. Yet little is known about how to provide science advice to legislatures, even though scientific information is widely acknowledged as valuable for decision-making in many policy domains. We asked academics, science advisers, and policymakers from both developed and developing nations to identify, review and refine, and then rank the most pressing research questions on legislative science advice (LSA). Experts generally agree that the state of evidence is poor, especially regarding developing and lower-middle income countries. Many fundamental questions about science advice processes remain unanswered and are of great interest: whether legislative use of scientific evidence improves the implementation and outcome of social programs and policies; under what conditions legislators and staff seek out scientific information or use what is presented to them; and how different communication channels affect informational trust and use. Environment and health are the highest priority policy domains for the field. The contextspecific nature of many of the submitted questions-whether to policy issues, institutions, or locations-suggests one of the significant challenges is aggregating generalizable evidence on LSA practices. Understanding these research needs represents a first step in advancing a global agenda for LSA research.Notes 1 By policymakers, we mean those in government who use science to make policy decisions, whether members of staff or elected representatives. ARTICLE PALGRAVE COMMUNICATIONS | https://doi.

Priorities for social science and humanities research on the challenges of moving beyond animal-based food systems

“…The Sutherland Method has come to prominence over the last decade as a participatory approach, engaging both researchers and non-academic stakeholders, to identifying and prioritising research questions in particular fields of enquiry including those which address societal grand challenges such as biodiversity loss, food supply and security (Sutherland et al, 2009(Sutherland et al, , 2011(Sutherland et al, , 2012Pretty et al, 2010;Ingram et al, 2013). Named after William Sutherland, who has played a leading role in developing and reporting the method, it has subsequently been utilised successfully in fields as diverse as animal research (Davies et al, 2016), legislative science advice (Akerlof et al, 2019) and the human microbiome (Greenhough et al, 2020). A number of methods exist to elicit expert views on matters of concern, e.g.…”

New Methods in Creating Transdisciplinary Science Policy Research Agendas: The Case of Legislative Science Advice

“…The study consisted of three stages that were conducted between September 2018 and January 2019: research question collection, vetting, and ranking. The methodology is also described in Akerlof et al, 2019. An online survey was first used to collect research questions on LSA from academics, science advisers, and policymakers worldwide (Sept.-Nov. 2018). Next, during a workshop at the International Network for Government Science Advice Conference on Nov. 8, 2018, in Tokyo, Japan, participants scrutinized the set of research questions.…”

“…In order to establish a contemporary agenda for research on LSA relevant to diverse stakeholders in both developing and developed nations, the research team conducted a series of exercises to collect and evaluate research questions from academics, practitioners, and policymakers worldwide. We reported the set of collaboratively generated research questions and findings about priority areas in Akerlof et al 2019. In this study, we use the data to assess differences between stakeholders, present a novel method for illustrating them, and interpret their meaning for the direction of a LSA research agenda.…”

“…The term LSA (Kenny et al 2017)-or alternately, parliamentary science advice (Tyler 2013)-refers to the "broad systems that provide scientific and technological information to legislatures, including-but not restricted to-legislative research services, committee support systems, technology assessment bodies, lobbyists, and advocacy coalitions" (Akerlof et al 2019 p. 2). As such, it represents a subfield within the discourse of "government science advice" (Gluckman 2016).…”

Cross-Industrial Priorities Of Economic Development: Experiences From Russia

“…The research of trends in the implementation of science and technology policy outlined in international and national programs, as well as in academic publications (Akerlof et al, 2019;Funk et al, 2020;Rolenc, 2019), shows that the justification of promising areas of technological development is an important component of the strategy development process in various countries.…”