2012 4th International Conference on Intelligent Human-Machine Systems and Cybernetics 2012
DOI: 10.1109/ihmsc.2012.89
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Collaborative Tag Recommendation Based on User Profile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9. As it can be clearly seen, the recall value is dropped by average of 18.29% when compared with the recall of [37]. The recall is also compared with three different user profiles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…9. As it can be clearly seen, the recall value is dropped by average of 18.29% when compared with the recall of [37]. The recall is also compared with three different user profiles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…10. As it can be seen, it shows improvement of 8.8% when compared with [37]. To calculate F1-score we also use three different user profiles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For determining, for a given user u, a given resource r, and some n ∈ N, the set (u,r) of n recommended tags we use User profile based tag recommendation [32] Tag based user profile : profile (u) = {(w1,t1), (w2,t2)..(wn,tn)} where ti ∈ T, wi is the weight of the ti, represents the importance of this tag to the user. Items are selected using balanced strategy, item tag matrix is constructed, for user u the preference relation between ti and tj for item k is calculated and ranking is done using voting, a vector is formed by the ranking tags, the profile of user u for item k is presented, ITW -Itemtagweight matrix is constructed, user similarity using Pearson correlation coefficient is calculated and most frequently used tags from the k similar user are recommended.…”
Section: Collaborative Filtering (Cf) [14]mentioning
confidence: 99%