2015
DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2015.24.7.312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A collaborative project to enhance efficiency through dressing change practice

Abstract: Alistair Bielby is a contractor for Smith & Nephew. Richard Searle is an employee of Smith & Nephew. This project was supported by an unrestricted grant from Smith & Nephew.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This example was reported as part of an evaluation of community health care provision for patients with a wound in a provider in the UK . The study results indicate that the introduction of a novel dressing allowed nurses to reduce the frequency of their nurse visits by almost two visits per patient per week and that procurement costs were also reduced through less frequent dressing changes.…”
Section: How Can We Deliver Improved Efficiency In Wound Management?mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This example was reported as part of an evaluation of community health care provision for patients with a wound in a provider in the UK . The study results indicate that the introduction of a novel dressing allowed nurses to reduce the frequency of their nurse visits by almost two visits per patient per week and that procurement costs were also reduced through less frequent dressing changes.…”
Section: How Can We Deliver Improved Efficiency In Wound Management?mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This capacity for reduction in this expenditure will depend on the pattern of dressing usage by a care provider, the mix of products that are used and the frequency with which they are changed. Nevertheless, even if only one quarter of the potential reduction reported by Joy et al were to be realised, this could indicate a 15–20% saving in dressing costs. * 3·5/1000 × 0·79 × 1 000 000 = 2765. † Assuming 31 minutes per visit .…”
Section: Making the Best Use Of Resources – Doing More With Lessmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…fractures, whereby absence of photographic documentation could be seen as adversely affecting a patient experience and outcome. For example, repeatedly taking down a dressing for multidisciplinary team assessment may result in unnecessary pain and risk of contamination [12]. In line with telemedicine, access to digital photography from a remote location without the need for in-person review allows for a wider access to expertise, which is especially useful in resource-limited settings.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%