Data were collected from documentation from an annual IPP system on the technical adequacy of goals set and subsequently achieved. Goal characteristics coded included functionality of goal set (natural environment, natural materials, and age-appropriateness), ideological characteristics (community presence, choices and decisions, maintaining and developing competence, positive social role, and community participation), behavioral technical adequacy (named person responsible, achievement date, and stated in measurable terms), and curriculum domain. Multiple regression analysis revealed that goals that were written in a technically correct fashion and that involved functional skills were more likely to be achieved. A greater variety of life goals predicted fewer goals being achieved.Setting goals for persons with developmental disabilities and staff who work with them has become an integral part of services. Goal setting is commonly used as part of a multidisciplinary Individual Program Plan (Chamberlain, 1985a,b;Blunden, Evans, & Humphreys, 1987;Sturmey, 1992) and is also a characteristic element in behavioral programs. Training staff to set and write goals has become a common area for applied research (Page et al., 1981;Sturmey, Newton, & Crisp, 1988a).The evaluation of goal planning has investigated a number of characteristics of goals that might contribute to effective programing, or which might be ideologically desirable. Goals have been classified as to the curricular domain into which they fall (De Kock, Saxby, Felce, Thomas, & Jenkins, 1988; Flemming, 1985Flemming, , 1988Jacobson, 1987;Laws, Bolt, & Gibbs, 1988;Lowe & De Paiva). The quality of goals has also been classified as to the functionality of the goal set, materials and setting used (Brown et al