2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A collaborative decision framework for managing changes in e-Government services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, it is important to make changes in the member services and also in the manner in which the services are co-operated with each other. In general, Change management refers to the task of addressing changes in a timely, planned and systematic manner [6]. But, this task is difficult because the XML representation of Web services guarantees syntactic interoperability but it is unable to semantically describe services [7,8], in addition, during such change requirements, the analyst must also ensure that various factors like the relationship between the existing services after the change, the correctness of the corresponding services involved in the change etc.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, it is important to make changes in the member services and also in the manner in which the services are co-operated with each other. In general, Change management refers to the task of addressing changes in a timely, planned and systematic manner [6]. But, this task is difficult because the XML representation of Web services guarantees syntactic interoperability but it is unable to semantically describe services [7,8], in addition, during such change requirements, the analyst must also ensure that various factors like the relationship between the existing services after the change, the correctness of the corresponding services involved in the change etc.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work of change model is to specify the requested top-down changes, while the goal of change reaction is to enact the changes. Apostolou et al [6] present an ontology-based approach where systematic response of e-Government systems is obtained to by applying formal methods. They have claimed that such a synthesis of systematic response to changes with knowledge to deal with them has a positive impact on the change management process.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a synthesis of systematic response to changes with knowledge to deal with then has a positive impact on change management process. So the decision making regarding public policy modifications can be achieved by systematically applying elementary and composite ontology changes [6] and by adopting semantic web services technology.…”
Section: Detailed Steps For the Process Of Life Cycle Of A Public Billmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apostolou et al (2011) [6] have illustrated an approach for the adaptation of e-Government services to changes in legislation, business requirements, users' needs etc. as well as the consistent propagation of these changes to dependent artifacts that are implemented using web service technologies.…”
Section: Use Of Ontology and Meta-models In Public Services Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Business process effectiveness, risk management and success factors and change management are three variable components of BPO (Apostolou et al, 2010;Babulall, 2011;Gong and Janssen, 2012). Each of these factors is a random variable because it attains various levels according to the random occurrences controlling their conditions.…”
Section: Variables Defining Bpomentioning
confidence: 99%