2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A collaborative approach to early detection of IoT Botnet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible to just use the subset of packets that fall inside a time window and calculate the desired features using them. As we already pointed out, some researchers looked for an optimal time window to detect botnet activity and settled on 180 s 35,37,39,40 . However, their research focused on attaining the best detection rate rather than spotting botnets in a small amount of time.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is possible to just use the subset of packets that fall inside a time window and calculate the desired features using them. As we already pointed out, some researchers looked for an optimal time window to detect botnet activity and settled on 180 s 35,37,39,40 . However, their research focused on attaining the best detection rate rather than spotting botnets in a small amount of time.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiments were carried out on the ISOT dataset with an ensemble model that combined k-means and DT, and the peak accuracy obtained was 99.4% , being relatively stable around this value if the time windows were inside the range between 150 and 300 seconds. In the same line, a recent work by Nguyen et al 40 proposed a collaborative detector that used features based on both network traffic and on computer processes, which also divided the activity on time windows. Their model also peaked in performance using time windows of 180 s.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However the main contrast between both [71], and ref. [72] is that Random Forest was considered within [72] approach which showed the highest accuracy, the accuracy further improves once the optimized model proposed by Nguyen et al [72] achieved "99.04" accuracy. Although since Random Forest is an ensemble variant for Decision Tree, the accuracy would justify the effectiveness of decision tree classifiers.…”
Section: Machine Learning Algorithms Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pattern that Tuan et al [71] identifies from the results table is that the higher the accuracy of the algorithms would mean that there would be more sensitivity present. Although, Nguyen et al [72] argued that Decision Tree classifiers are the most accurate from their prediction scores. However the main contrast between both [71], and ref.…”
Section: Machine Learning Algorithms Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Internet of Things network is exposed to all kinds of viruses and malware [3], and smart objects can be infected with all kinds of malware. Systems or objects infected with malware or botnets carry out malicious attacks against the network and disrupt network services [4]. DDoS attacks are an example of botnet attacks on the Internet of Things network and disrupt the provision of Internet of Things services.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%