2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-022-07314-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cohort study measuring SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion and serial viral testing in university students

Abstract: Background To improve understanding of the antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 infection, we examined seroprevalence, incidence of infection, and seroconversion among a cohort of young adults living on university campuses during the fall of 2020. Methods At the beginning (semester start) and end (semester end) of an 11-week period, serum collected from 107 students was tested using the qualitative Abbott Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG and AdviseDx SARS-CoV-2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the baseline and 6-month seroprevalence values were likely mostly due to natural infection, it is expected that the vaccine rollout played a significant role in the increase in seropositivity at 12 months. While smaller serosurveys have identified significant trends among small populations, these trends may not be applicable in larger populations (35,36). In this study we utilized a large number of samples from the United States and additionally screened for antibodies against a wide number of antigens to allow for identification of trends in seroprevalence for several different antigens to overcome some of the limitations of smaller serosurveys.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the baseline and 6-month seroprevalence values were likely mostly due to natural infection, it is expected that the vaccine rollout played a significant role in the increase in seropositivity at 12 months. While smaller serosurveys have identified significant trends among small populations, these trends may not be applicable in larger populations (35,36). In this study we utilized a large number of samples from the United States and additionally screened for antibodies against a wide number of antigens to allow for identification of trends in seroprevalence for several different antigens to overcome some of the limitations of smaller serosurveys.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,2] Early serosurveys assessed anti-spike (S) or anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) seropositivity in vaccine-naïve individuals, but this approach cannot disentangle infection-from vaccine-induced seropositivity in vaccinated individuals. Anti-nucleocapsid (N) seroprevalence was initially viewed as a solution to this challenge but is more affected by seroreversion than anti-S or anti-RBD seroprevalence, [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] thus leading to declining or stagnating seroprevalence estimates despite rising case counts. [3,13,14] What is more, emerging evidence suggests that vaccination hinders the sensitivity of conventional anti-N assays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%