2019
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2019-00664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cohort Analysis of Clinical and Ultrasound Variables Predicting Cancer Risk in 20,001 Consecutive Thyroid Nodules

Abstract: Context Assessing thyroid nodules for malignancy is complex. The impact of patient and nodule factors on cancer evaluation is uncertain. Objectives To determine precise estimates of cancer risk associated with clinical and sonographic variables obtained during thyroid nodule assessment. Design Analysis of consecutive adult patients evaluated with ultrasound-g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
30
2
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
30
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, a large tumor size is a useful feature for indicating the worse prognosis of PTC (27,28), but it remains unknown in RR-DTC. Here, we drew the opposite conclusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, a large tumor size is a useful feature for indicating the worse prognosis of PTC (27,28), but it remains unknown in RR-DTC. Here, we drew the opposite conclusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models that integrate multiple clinical and radiological variables can enhance our estimation of risk of thyroid cancer before FNA. However, as a result of better diagnostic performance, they mostly rely on ultrasound risk assessment 4122123…”
Section: Estimating the Risk Of Thyroid Cancer And Need For Thyroid Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although extensive attention has been paid to defining the risk of thyroid malignancy due to specific clinical, radiologic, or cytologic findings, relatively few studies have attempted to integrate this data 16‐22 . Angell et al used a combination of histology and cytology outcomes where they considered all benign cytology results equivalent to a benign histology result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is a potential bias in our cohort due to its restriction to surgically managed nodules, it is challenging to better define outcome; of note, some related studies have evaluated clinical and sonographic variables against cytologic (rather than histologic) outcome, but this approach is suboptimal and prohibits the use of cytology as an input variable 16,24,25 . Alternately, while long‐term clinical follow‐up and/or “benign” FNA molecular testing might be utilized as outcome surrogates for non‐surgically managed nodules, they each have significant limitations, notably, the variable accuracy of the different available molecular tests and the slow progression of most thyroid cancers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%