2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cognitive architecture for modeling emotion dynamics: Intensity estimation from physiological signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various approaches in affective sciences have been used to investigate the relationship between physiological responses and emotional experience. For example, dimensional models of emotion based on arousal and valence have been used widely to describe the experienced emotion and relate emotional intensity to physiological responses ( Bradley et al, 2001 ; Bradley & Lang, 2000 ; Lang et al, 1993 ; Jenke & Peer, 2018 ). These studies have demonstrated that arousal and valence ratings are related significantly to physiological responses to emotional stimuli.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various approaches in affective sciences have been used to investigate the relationship between physiological responses and emotional experience. For example, dimensional models of emotion based on arousal and valence have been used widely to describe the experienced emotion and relate emotional intensity to physiological responses ( Bradley et al, 2001 ; Bradley & Lang, 2000 ; Lang et al, 1993 ; Jenke & Peer, 2018 ). These studies have demonstrated that arousal and valence ratings are related significantly to physiological responses to emotional stimuli.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they measured intensity as the level of arousal and valence instead of the level of the experienced discrete emotion, that is, fear specifically. Similarly, Jenke and Peer ( 2018 ) examined the link between emotional intensity and physiological signals, but it was difficult to define the specific physiological responses to fear since they used an appraisal model that conceptualizes emotion based on the dimensions of relevance, implication, coping potential, and normative significances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Krone et al [25] proposed a vector autoregressive Bayesian sentiment dynamics model to predict the basic emotions with long-term dependence based on short time sequences. Jenke and Peer [26] used dynamic field theory, combined with theoretical knowledge and data-driven experimental methods, to model the dynamic characteristics of emotions, deepening the understanding of emotional mechanisms. The above research fully exploited the time-dependent attributes of emotions and modeled the emotional system as a shock-recovery model with some steady-state characteristics.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After adding the Wong-Zakai correction, Eq. ( 25) can be transformed into the following It ô stochastic differential equation dy = α (y, t)dt + β (y, t)dW (t), (26) in which…”
Section: So We Obtain Dymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It enables continues prediction of valance and arousal over time. In [19] a dynamic model is proposed based on dynamic field theory (DFT) enabling prediction of emotion intensity. DFT can be seen as a generalization of recurrent neural networks to continuous dimensions, adding a functional interpretation to each layer.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%