SAE Technical Paper Series 1999
DOI: 10.4271/1999-01-5567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cockpit Display Designed to Enable Limited Flight Deck Separation Responsibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The context for our evaluation of these four factors is the cockpit display of traffic information (CDTI), a system proposed within future cockpits to provide pilots with a traffic display that is partially redundant with the air traffic controller's display and may, in some future airspace plans, allow pilots to monitor their course for conflicts and to initiate the choice to make route changes (Johnson, Battiste, & Bochow, 1999;Thomas & Wickens, 2005;Wickens, Helleberg, & Xu, 2002;Wickens, Goh, Helleberg, Horrey, & Talleur, 2003). Indeed, it has been proposed that such systems be coupled with discrete alerts (Thomas & Rantanen, 2006;Xu et al, 2007), paralleling similar alerting systems for air traffic control (Metzger & Parasuraman, 2005) and for more emergency airborne conflicts (the Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System [TCAS]).…”
Section: Dual-task Performance Consequences Of Imperfect Alerting Assmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The context for our evaluation of these four factors is the cockpit display of traffic information (CDTI), a system proposed within future cockpits to provide pilots with a traffic display that is partially redundant with the air traffic controller's display and may, in some future airspace plans, allow pilots to monitor their course for conflicts and to initiate the choice to make route changes (Johnson, Battiste, & Bochow, 1999;Thomas & Wickens, 2005;Wickens, Helleberg, & Xu, 2002;Wickens, Goh, Helleberg, Horrey, & Talleur, 2003). Indeed, it has been proposed that such systems be coupled with discrete alerts (Thomas & Rantanen, 2006;Xu et al, 2007), paralleling similar alerting systems for air traffic control (Metzger & Parasuraman, 2005) and for more emergency airborne conflicts (the Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System [TCAS]).…”
Section: Dual-task Performance Consequences Of Imperfect Alerting Assmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They typically rely upon alternative display devices and tangible interaction devices. For example, flight simulators such as the Boeing 777 Cockpit Simulator, developed by NASA Ames' Flight Deck Display Research Laboratory (W. Johnson and Battiste 2006), have been used for decades to safely train pilots in a manner that approximates real-world flight conditions. The MEDIATE environment was designed to foster a sense of agency and a capacity for creative expression in people on the autistic spectrum (EU Community Report 2004; Pares et al 2004;Pares et al 2005).…”
Section: Interactive Technologies For Collaborative Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ongoing work on Tailored Arrivals 21 is an important initial step into this direction by implementing trajectory exchange between the airborne FMS and the ground-based automation in the near term in a low density environment. In order to implement trajectory management effectively in high density airspace, controller and flight deck tools need to be well designed and integrated into their respective operator stations 20,22 .…”
Section: American Institute Of Aeronautics and Astronauticsmentioning
confidence: 99%