2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-015-3098-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cochrane review on brain [18F]FDG PET in dementia: limitations and future perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
30
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In all between-group comparisons except hippocampus volume, the EMCI subjects were similar to the healthy CN controls, underscoring the heterogeneity of this clinical concept. The lack of difference in PCC metabolism dissociates EMCI from the classical MCI concept in which PCC hypometabolism has been shown as a robust finding [50]. Third, effect sizes for the significant effects of hippocampus volume on PCC metabolism were small, particularly in CN and EMCI subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all between-group comparisons except hippocampus volume, the EMCI subjects were similar to the healthy CN controls, underscoring the heterogeneity of this clinical concept. The lack of difference in PCC metabolism dissociates EMCI from the classical MCI concept in which PCC hypometabolism has been shown as a robust finding [50]. Third, effect sizes for the significant effects of hippocampus volume on PCC metabolism were small, particularly in CN and EMCI subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a limited accuracy of prediction by 18 F-FDG PET of conversion from MCI to AD was reported in some studies (6)(7)(8). Likewise, a Cochrane review did not recommend using 18 F-FDG PET for this purpose (9), although this recommendation has been a matter of controversy (10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Values for sensitivity and specificity are quite variable, depending on disease severity as well as on the specific metric used, but the overall performance of the test is good, with a median sensitivity and specificity of 80 and 72.5%, respectively [9, 10]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%